Figures & data
Figure 1. Representations of different artificial bones in reality: (a) powder of nano-HA artificial bone; (b) Nano-HA artificial bone; (c) normal HA artificial bone; (d) X-ray diffraction spectrum: a-human bone, b-nano-HA artificial bone.
![Figure 1. Representations of different artificial bones in reality: (a) powder of nano-HA artificial bone; (b) Nano-HA artificial bone; (c) normal HA artificial bone; (d) X-ray diffraction spectrum: a-human bone, b-nano-HA artificial bone.](/cms/asset/c9a61238-c6c0-47f1-bca4-cac53b41d730/ianb19_a_471797_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Structure of specimen under invert microscope: (a) Nano-HA artificial bone; (b) Normal HA artificial bone. (×400).
![Figure 2. Structure of specimen under invert microscope: (a) Nano-HA artificial bone; (b) Normal HA artificial bone. (×400).](/cms/asset/a23cd9b7-57b6-4878-b9e8-69baac041e13/ianb19_a_471797_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. X-ray photograph for the bone defect of group A: (a) at 4th week, the material has been degraded partly; (b) at 8th week, the interaction surface between new bone tissues and the material was illegible; (c) at 12th week, the material has been degraded completely, and the bone defect has been repaired.
![Figure 3. X-ray photograph for the bone defect of group A: (a) at 4th week, the material has been degraded partly; (b) at 8th week, the interaction surface between new bone tissues and the material was illegible; (c) at 12th week, the material has been degraded completely, and the bone defect has been repaired.](/cms/asset/7aa9a732-88c3-459c-81c2-3f48167d1e0e/ianb19_a_471797_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. X-ray photograph for the bone defect of group B: (a) at 4th week, the interaction surface between new bone tissues and the material is clear; (b) at 8th week, the interaction surface between new bone tissues and the material is clear; (c) at 12th week, the material has not been degraded completely, and the bone defect has been partly repaired.
![Figure 4. X-ray photograph for the bone defect of group B: (a) at 4th week, the interaction surface between new bone tissues and the material is clear; (b) at 8th week, the interaction surface between new bone tissues and the material is clear; (c) at 12th week, the material has not been degraded completely, and the bone defect has been partly repaired.](/cms/asset/69f839c8-6c39-4bc4-860a-53e9b411b001/ianb19_a_471797_f0004_b.jpg)
Table 1. Bone formation and Lane-Sandhu X-ray molding score among different groups (Mean±SD)
Figure 5. Radionuclide bone imaging photo of group A: (a) at 4th week; (b) at 8th week; (c) at 12th week, respectively.
![Figure 5. Radionuclide bone imaging photo of group A: (a) at 4th week; (b) at 8th week; (c) at 12th week, respectively.](/cms/asset/a52fe8b1-4e8b-4d91-a930-adf4902e3da6/ianb19_a_471797_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6. Radionuclide bone imaging photo of group B: (a) at 4th week; (b) at 8th week; (c) at 12th week, respectively.
![Figure 6. Radionuclide bone imaging photo of group B: (a) at 4th week; (b) at 8th week; (c) at 12th week, respectively.](/cms/asset/5956ba1c-b5df-43a0-88ef-aacc13f0e620/ianb19_a_471797_f0006_b.jpg)
Table 2. Intape ratio of operative site in static phase (S, n=5)
Table 3. Biomechanical test results of three different groups (Mean±SD, n = 4)