470
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Polymerized Human Placenta Hemoglobin (PolyPHb) Attenuates Myocardial Infarction Injury in Rats

, , , , &
Pages 7-13 | Published online: 31 May 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1. Effect of PolyPHb and PolyPHb + CAT + SOD on ST-wave change in ECG. Values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 20). *P < 0.05 vs control group.

Figure 1. Effect of PolyPHb and PolyPHb + CAT + SOD on ST-wave change in ECG. Values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 20). *P < 0.05 vs control group.

Figure 2. The total cTnT release of 3 groups after 24 hours of MI. Values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 20). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs control group.

Figure 2. The total cTnT release of 3 groups after 24 hours of MI. Values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 20). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs control group.

Figure 3. Myocardial infarct size determined by NBT staining. Normal myocardium stained dark blue within 15 min, while the infarcts remained unstained or stained only faintly. NBT staining in control group (A); treated with PolyPHb group (B); treated with PolyPHb + CAT +SOD (C); and the percentage of myocardial infarct size (D). Values were expressed as mean ± SEM(n = 10). *P < 0.05 vs control group.

Figure 3. Myocardial infarct size determined by NBT staining. Normal myocardium stained dark blue within 15 min, while the infarcts remained unstained or stained only faintly. NBT staining in control group (A); treated with PolyPHb group (B); treated with PolyPHb + CAT +SOD (C); and the percentage of myocardial infarct size (D). Values were expressed as mean ± SEM(n = 10). *P < 0.05 vs control group.

Figure 4. The statistical analysis of the HE-stained cardiac section (n = 10). The pathological picture in control group (B); treated with PolyPHb group (C); treated with PolyPHb + CAT + SOD (D); and the pathological scores (A). The pathological scores of the PolyPHb + CAT + SOD group were markedly reduced compared with the scores of the control group. Values were presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs control group.

Figure 4. The statistical analysis of the HE-stained cardiac section (n = 10). The pathological picture in control group (B); treated with PolyPHb group (C); treated with PolyPHb + CAT + SOD (D); and the pathological scores (A). The pathological scores of the PolyPHb + CAT + SOD group were markedly reduced compared with the scores of the control group. Values were presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs control group.

Figure 5. Ischemia changes of cardiomyocytes determined by HBFP staining. Ischemic heart muscle, RBCs, collagen tissue stained with crimson red, while other tissues and structures stained with yellow. The HBFP staining picture in control group (B); in PolyPHb treated group (C); in PolyPHb + CAT + SOD treated group (D); and the pathological scores (A). Values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs control group. ##P < 0.01 vs PolyPHb group.

Figure 5. Ischemia changes of cardiomyocytes determined by HBFP staining. Ischemic heart muscle, RBCs, collagen tissue stained with crimson red, while other tissues and structures stained with yellow. The HBFP staining picture in control group (B); in PolyPHb treated group (C); in PolyPHb + CAT + SOD treated group (D); and the pathological scores (A). Values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs control group. ##P < 0.01 vs PolyPHb group.

Figure 6. Apoptotic cells of cardiomyocytes determined by TUNEL staining. TUNEL detection in control group (B); in the group treated with PolyPHb (C); in the group treated with PolyPHb + CAT + SOD (D); and TUNEL positive cells ratio (A). The number of TUNEL positive vs control group when treatment with PolyPHb and PolyPHb + CAT + SOD at MI decreased. Values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10). **P < 0.01 vs control group, ##P < 0.01 vs PolyPHb group.

Figure 6. Apoptotic cells of cardiomyocytes determined by TUNEL staining. TUNEL detection in control group (B); in the group treated with PolyPHb (C); in the group treated with PolyPHb + CAT + SOD (D); and TUNEL positive cells ratio (A). The number of TUNEL positive vs control group when treatment with PolyPHb and PolyPHb + CAT + SOD at MI decreased. Values were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10). **P < 0.01 vs control group, ##P < 0.01 vs PolyPHb group.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.