331
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sulfite Determination by an Inhibitor Biosensor-based Mushroom (Agaricus Bisporus) Tissue Homogenate

&
Pages 38-43 | Published online: 30 Jun 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1. Optimum pH. [Phosphate buffers with pHs 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5 and 8, and tris-HCl buffers with pHs 8.5 and 9 were used. Buffer concentrations were 0.05 M. Catechol, substrate, and sulfite, as an inhibitor, concentrations were 100×10−6 and 150×10−6 M, respectively. T = 35° C. (S.D. values for data points are given as differentiation in dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/mL): pH 6 (0.005), pH 6.5 (0.007), pH 7(0.004), pH 7.5 (0.005), pH 8 (0.005), pH 8.5 (0.007), pH 9 (0.0025)].

Figure 1. Optimum pH. [Phosphate buffers with pHs 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5 and 8, and tris-HCl buffers with pHs 8.5 and 9 were used. Buffer concentrations were 0.05 M. Catechol, substrate, and sulfite, as an inhibitor, concentrations were 100×10−6 and 150×10−6 M, respectively. T = 35° C. (S.D. values for data points are given as differentiation in dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/mL): pH 6 (0.005), pH 6.5 (0.007), pH 7(0.004), pH 7.5 (0.005), pH 8 (0.005), pH 8.5 (0.007), pH 9 (0.0025)].

Figure 2. Optimum temperature. [Working conditions: pH 6.5, 0.05 M phosphate buffer was used. Catechol, substrate, and sulfite, as an inhibitor, concentrations were 100×10−6 and 150×10−6 M, respectively. (S.D. values for data points are given as differentiation in dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/mL): 20°C (0.002), 25°C (0.005), 30°C (0.005), 35°C (0.0025), 40°C (0.005), 45°C (0.0075)].

Figure 2. Optimum temperature. [Working conditions: pH 6.5, 0.05 M phosphate buffer was used. Catechol, substrate, and sulfite, as an inhibitor, concentrations were 100×10−6 and 150×10−6 M, respectively. (S.D. values for data points are given as differentiation in dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/mL): 20°C (0.002), 25°C (0.005), 30°C (0.005), 35°C (0.0025), 40°C (0.005), 45°C (0.0075)].

Figure 3. The effect of substrate type on sulfite determination. [Substrate types used: -•-•-: Catechol, -▪-▪-: Ascorbic acid and -▴-▴-: Pyrogallol. The concentrations of these substrates were constant as 100×10−6 M. Working conditions: pH 6.5, 0.05 M phosphate buffer and T = 35 °C. (S.D. values for data points of catechol: 50×10−6 M (0.0025), 75×10−6 M (0.0025), 100×10−6 M (0.0025), 150×10−6 M (0.005), 200×10−6 M (0.005), 300×10−6 M (0.005). S.D. values for data points of ascorbic acid: 50×10−6 M (0.002), 75×10−6 M (0.002), 100×10−6 M (0.0015), 150×10−6 M (0.0025), 200×10−6 M (0.0025), 300×10−6 M (0.0025)].

Figure 3. The effect of substrate type on sulfite determination. [Substrate types used: -•-•-: Catechol, -▪-▪-: Ascorbic acid and -▴-▴-: Pyrogallol. The concentrations of these substrates were constant as 100×10−6 M. Working conditions: pH 6.5, 0.05 M phosphate buffer and T = 35 °C. (S.D. values for data points of catechol: 50×10−6 M (0.0025), 75×10−6 M (0.0025), 100×10−6 M (0.0025), 150×10−6 M (0.005), 200×10−6 M (0.005), 300×10−6 M (0.005). S.D. values for data points of ascorbic acid: 50×10−6 M (0.002), 75×10−6 M (0.002), 100×10−6 M (0.0015), 150×10−6 M (0.0025), 200×10−6 M (0.0025), 300×10−6 M (0.0025)].

Figure 4. The effect of substate concentration. [Substrate concentrations tested: -•-•-: 100×10−6, -▪-▪-:200×10−6, and -▴-▴-: 50×10−6 M. Working conditions: pH 6.5, 0.05 M phosphate buffer and T = 35 °C. (S.D. values for data points of 100×10−6 M catechol: 50×10−6 M (0.005), 75×10−6 M (0.005), 100×10−6 M (0.004), 150×10−6 M (0.004), 200×10−6 M (0.005), 300×10−6 M (0.0075). S.D. values for data points of 200×10−6 M catechol: 50×10−6 M (0.005), 75×10−6 M (0.005), 100×10−6 M (0.0075), 150×10−6 M (0.0075), 200×10−6 M (0.0075), 50×10−6 M (0.0075). S.D. values for data points of 50×10−6 M catechol: 50×10−6 M (0.0075), 75×10−6 M (0.0075), 100×10−6 M (0.01), 150×10−6 M (0.01), 200×10−6 M (0.01), 50×10−6 M (0.025)].

Figure 4. The effect of substate concentration. [Substrate concentrations tested: -•-•-: 100×10−6, -▪-▪-:200×10−6, and -▴-▴-: 50×10−6 M. Working conditions: pH 6.5, 0.05 M phosphate buffer and T = 35 °C. (S.D. values for data points of 100×10−6 M catechol: 50×10−6 M (0.005), 75×10−6 M (0.005), 100×10−6 M (0.004), 150×10−6 M (0.004), 200×10−6 M (0.005), 300×10−6 M (0.0075). S.D. values for data points of 200×10−6 M catechol: 50×10−6 M (0.005), 75×10−6 M (0.005), 100×10−6 M (0.0075), 150×10−6 M (0.0075), 200×10−6 M (0.0075), 50×10−6 M (0.0075). S.D. values for data points of 50×10−6 M catechol: 50×10−6 M (0.0075), 75×10−6 M (0.0075), 100×10−6 M (0.01), 150×10−6 M (0.01), 200×10−6 M (0.01), 50×10−6 M (0.025)].

Figure 5. Sulfite calibration graph. [Working conditions: pH 6.5, 0.05 M phosphate buffer and T = 35°C. Catechol concentration was 100×10−6].

Figure 5. Sulfite calibration graph. [Working conditions: pH 6.5, 0.05 M phosphate buffer and T = 35°C. Catechol concentration was 100×10−6].

Table 1. Sulfite analysis in some real samples by the biosensor and by the enzymatic reference method [Citation10].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.