1,224
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

A system for ultrasound-guided computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery

, , &
Pages 281-292 | Received 26 Apr 2005, Accepted 25 May 2005, Published online: 06 Jan 2010

Figures & data

Figure 1. Problems of preoperative-CT- and intraoperative-fluoroscopy-based CAOS systems.

Figure 1. Problems of preoperative-CT- and intraoperative-fluoroscopy-based CAOS systems.

Figure 2. An overview of the methodology of the proposed UCAOS system.

Figure 2. An overview of the methodology of the proposed UCAOS system.

Figure 3. Object-oriented component-based system design in UML.

Figure 3. Object-oriented component-based system design in UML.

Figure 4. Hardware configurations of the proposed UCAOS system.

Figure 4. Hardware configurations of the proposed UCAOS system.

Figure 5. Experimental setup. (a) A stainless steel mounting jig was built to image a radius-bone phantom in a water bath. (b) A wooden mounting brace was wrapped around the arm of a human subject using velcro pads.

Figure 5. Experimental setup. (a) A stainless steel mounting jig was built to image a radius-bone phantom in a water bath. (b) A wooden mounting brace was wrapped around the arm of a human subject using velcro pads.

Figure 6. (a) The N-wire US probe calibration phantom. (b) A US image showing the cross-section of the N-wires.

Figure 6. (a) The N-wire US probe calibration phantom. (b) A US image showing the cross-section of the N-wires.

Figure 7. Validation of the US probe calibration result.

Figure 7. Validation of the US probe calibration result.

Table 1.  Validation of the US probe calibration result.

Figure 8. 3D US volume reconstruction process.

Figure 8. 3D US volume reconstruction process.

Figure 9. 3D US volume rendering of the distal end of a radius-bone phantom.

Figure 9. 3D US volume rendering of the distal end of a radius-bone phantom.

Figure 10. Registration results of Experiment Type I with live images randomly selected from the preoperative images: best matching results for one of the live images from the radius phantom (a and b) and the human subject (c and d) (color version available online).

Figure 10. Registration results of Experiment Type I with live images randomly selected from the preoperative images: best matching results for one of the live images from the radius phantom (a and b) and the human subject (c and d) (color version available online).

Figure 11. Registration results of Experiment Type II with live images acquired at a different time: best matching results for one of the live images from the human subject (a and b) (color version available online).

Figure 11. Registration results of Experiment Type II with live images acquired at a different time: best matching results for one of the live images from the human subject (a and b) (color version available online).

Figure 12. Visualization of the registration result (color version available online).

Figure 12. Visualization of the registration result (color version available online).

Figure 13. Relationship between the mutual information and the distance of the matching images to the live image (color version available online).

Figure 13. Relationship between the mutual information and the distance of the matching images to the live image (color version available online).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.