457
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Biomedical paper

A potential function approach to surface coverage for a surgical robot

, &
Pages 1-9 | Received 07 Sep 2004, Accepted 03 Feb 2005, Published online: 06 Jan 2010

Figures & data

Figure 1. CAD drawing of MBARS. [Color version available online]

Figure 1. CAD drawing of MBARS. [Color version available online]

Figure 2. X-ray showing the final position of the implant Citation[10].

Figure 2. X-ray showing the final position of the implant Citation[10].

Figure 3. Two views of the trochlear component surface model. [Color version available online]

Figure 3. Two views of the trochlear component surface model. [Color version available online]

Figure 4. The implant aligned along the trochlear groove. The plane contains both the centerline of the implant and the trochlear groove of the knee model. Small dots represent each point of the knee collected by the CT imagery. [Color version available online]

Figure 4. The implant aligned along the trochlear groove. The plane contains both the centerline of the implant and the trochlear groove of the knee model. Small dots represent each point of the knee collected by the CT imagery. [Color version available online]

Figure 5. Implant in four positions rotated in 15° increments about the distal tip. [Color version available online]

Figure 5. Implant in four positions rotated in 15° increments about the distal tip. [Color version available online]

Figure 6. Implant fitted on patellofemoral surface. [Color version available online]

Figure 6. Implant fitted on patellofemoral surface. [Color version available online]

Figure 7. Cellular decomposition: the resulting cells, marked by circular icons, are shown in step d.

Figure 7. Cellular decomposition: the resulting cells, marked by circular icons, are shown in step d.

Figure 8. Cellular decomposition of the implant with the scan line shown at the critical step.

Figure 8. Cellular decomposition of the implant with the scan line shown at the critical step.

Figure 9. Coverage of the leftmost cell from .

Figure 9. Coverage of the leftmost cell from figure 7.

Figure 10. The circular cutting tool tip leaves ridges known as scallops. Scallop height is dependent on the amount of overlap of the cuts made by the tool.

Figure 10. The circular cutting tool tip leaves ridges known as scallops. Scallop height is dependent on the amount of overlap of the cuts made by the tool.

Figure 11. Step 1: Find the intersection of the start plane and knee model. Circles represent discrete points a set distance apart on the resulting intersection. Note that points on the intersection that fall outside the implant area are not shown.

Figure 11. Step 1: Find the intersection of the start plane and knee model. Circles represent discrete points a set distance apart on the resulting intersection. Note that points on the intersection that fall outside the implant area are not shown.

Figure 12. Steps 2–3: Sweep until entire the area containing the implant has been covered.

Figure 12. Steps 2–3: Sweep until entire the area containing the implant has been covered.

Figure 13. Pruning sweep lines for step 4 and identifying critical points for step 5. [Color version available online]

Figure 13. Pruning sweep lines for step 4 and identifying critical points for step 5. [Color version available online]

Figure 14. Step 5: Fix sweep lines that cross the negative area of the implant. Connect the two cells (as indicated by the arrow) for a single trajectory that covers the entire area to be milled. [Color version available online]

Figure 14. Step 5: Fix sweep lines that cross the negative area of the implant. Connect the two cells (as indicated by the arrow) for a single trajectory that covers the entire area to be milled. [Color version available online]

Figure 15. Mapping from R2 to U. [Color version available online]

Figure 15. Mapping from R2 to U. [Color version available online]

Figure 16. Typical trajectory as formed by virtual forces. The first position demonstrates the surface as a repulsive force, the second demonstrates it as an attractive force. [Color version available online]

Figure 16. Typical trajectory as formed by virtual forces. The first position demonstrates the surface as a repulsive force, the second demonstrates it as an attractive force. [Color version available online]

Figure 17. Simulated paths across a fourth-order polynomial. Curves further away from the surface correspond to smaller values of Kg. The polynomial was chosen using least squares to best fit the surface model points. [Color version available online]

Figure 17. Simulated paths across a fourth-order polynomial. Curves further away from the surface correspond to smaller values of Kg. The polynomial was chosen using least squares to best fit the surface model points. [Color version available online]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.