2,128
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Biomedical Paper

Implant position calculation for acetabular cup placement considering pelvic lateral tilt and inclination

, &
Pages 309-316 | Received 07 Jan 2006, Accepted 24 Aug 2006, Published online: 06 Jan 2010

Figures & data

Figure 1. Sawbone pelvis model: Attached plumb line, pelvis frontal plane, and acetabular cup with rod indicating its inclination and anteversion angles.

Figure 1. Sawbone pelvis model: Attached plumb line, pelvis frontal plane, and acetabular cup with rod indicating its inclination and anteversion angles.

Figure 2. Vertical plane of the sawbone model.

Figure 2. Vertical plane of the sawbone model.

Figure 3. Visualized frontal plane of the pelvis.

Figure 3. Visualized frontal plane of the pelvis.

Figure 4. Increasing pelvic inclination leading to a change in anteversion.

Figure 4. Increasing pelvic inclination leading to a change in anteversion.

Figure 5. Microsoft Excel program screenshot showing the results of calculating the projected cup positions in a pelvis with 20° of inclination and left hip elevated 15°.

Figure 5. Microsoft Excel program screenshot showing the results of calculating the projected cup positions in a pelvis with 20° of inclination and left hip elevated 15°.

Figure 6. Acetabular cup inclination in relation to pelvic inclination. Values are given in degrees.

Figure 6. Acetabular cup inclination in relation to pelvic inclination. Values are given in degrees.

Table I.  Projected implant positions in the vertical plane with acetabular cup position of 45° inclination / 15° anteversion with regard to the pelvis frontal plane and different grades of pelvic inclination.

Figure 7. Acetabular cup anteversion in relation to pelvic inclination. Values are given in degrees.

Figure 7. Acetabular cup anteversion in relation to pelvic inclination. Values are given in degrees.

Table II.  Calculated cup positions in relation to the pelvis frontal plane for a projection of 45° inclination / 15° anteversion in the vertical frontal plane for different degrees of pelvic inclination.

Table III.  Influence of leg length difference on pelvic lateral tilt angle.

Table IV.  Effect of pelvic lateral tilt and inclination on projected implant positions in the vertical plane with bilateral acetabular cup positions of 45° inclination / 15° anteversion with regard to the pelvis frontal plane.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.