1,167
Views
46
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Biomedical Papers

Computer assisted pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction with a custom-made prosthesis using an innovative adaptation and its validation

, , , , , & show all
Pages 225-232 | Received 22 Jul 2006, Accepted 11 Mar 2007, Published online: 06 Jan 2010

Figures & data

Figure 1. Plain radiograph (A), CT scan (B) and MRI scan (C) of patient's pelvis, showing a destructive bony metastasis involving the left acetabular region.

Figure 1. Plain radiograph (A), CT scan (B) and MRI scan (C) of patient's pelvis, showing a destructive bony metastasis involving the left acetabular region.

Figure 2. Computer-aided design custom pelvic prosthesis for skeletal reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection. [Color version available online.]

Figure 2. Computer-aided design custom pelvic prosthesis for skeletal reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection. [Color version available online.]

Figure 3. The most important and easily identifiable bony landmark was point 1, which was the intersection point between the acetabular rim and the anterior inferior iliac spine. Other points and measurements were all based on point 1. Point 3 and other points at the acetabular rim were arbitrary. The custom pelvic prosthesis was designed in such a way that orientation of the superior surface of the prosthesis is parallel to the ground when the patient is in a standing position. When a person stands upright, the plane formed by the two anterior superior iliac spines and pubic tubercles is perpendicular to the ground. Therefore, orientation of the prosthesis and bony resection could be defined and planned using this plane. Based on points 2 and 4 and the above information, the plane and level of bony resection could be defined with points 1–4 in the navigation planning. Other points and distances were used to verify the accuracy of this plane definition. [Color version available online.]

Figure 3. The most important and easily identifiable bony landmark was point 1, which was the intersection point between the acetabular rim and the anterior inferior iliac spine. Other points and measurements were all based on point 1. Point 3 and other points at the acetabular rim were arbitrary. The custom pelvic prosthesis was designed in such a way that orientation of the superior surface of the prosthesis is parallel to the ground when the patient is in a standing position. When a person stands upright, the plane formed by the two anterior superior iliac spines and pubic tubercles is perpendicular to the ground. Therefore, orientation of the prosthesis and bony resection could be defined and planned using this plane. Based on points 2 and 4 and the above information, the plane and level of bony resection could be defined with points 1–4 in the navigation planning. Other points and distances were used to verify the accuracy of this plane definition. [Color version available online.]

Figure 4. The cut surface of the ilium after pelvic resection under navigational guidance (A); after preoperative simulation of the pelvic resection in the plaster model (B); and at the predetermined level of pelvic resection on CAD data (C). [Color version available online.]

Figure 4. The cut surface of the ilium after pelvic resection under navigational guidance (A); after preoperative simulation of the pelvic resection in the plaster model (B); and at the predetermined level of pelvic resection on CAD data (C). [Color version available online.]

Figure 5. Intraoperative screen images on the navigation monitor. The location of the navigated diathermy electrode (white line) was seen in relation to the peri-acetabular tumor. The proximal margin and location of planned screws could be identified in coronal images (A), obliques images (B), and reconstructed three-dimensional images (C). In panel D, a dynamic reference base tracker is seen attached to the left iliac crest, with a navigated diathermy electrode being used to identify the virtual margin and the resection level on the navigation monitor. [Color version available online.]

Figure 5. Intraoperative screen images on the navigation monitor. The location of the navigated diathermy electrode (white line) was seen in relation to the peri-acetabular tumor. The proximal margin and location of planned screws could be identified in coronal images (A), obliques images (B), and reconstructed three-dimensional images (C). In panel D, a dynamic reference base tracker is seen attached to the left iliac crest, with a navigated diathermy electrode being used to identify the virtual margin and the resection level on the navigation monitor. [Color version available online.]

Figure 6. Postoperative plain radiograph showing satisfactory alignment of the custom pelvic prosthesis.

Figure 6. Postoperative plain radiograph showing satisfactory alignment of the custom pelvic prosthesis.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.