688
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Navigated versus conventional transfixation of AC joint injuries: Feasibility and accuracy

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 68-75 | Received 27 Nov 2012, Accepted 20 Dec 2012, Published online: 04 Feb 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Laboratory set-up. (a) Positioning on the radiolucent table with the flat detector 3D C-arm. The Kirschner wire is navigated via a navigated drill guide. The reference marker is attached to the spina scapulae. (b) Screenshot of a navigated AC joint transfixation. The upper left panel shows the aiming trajectory; the other panels show the planned trajectory.

Figure 1. Laboratory set-up. (a) Positioning on the radiolucent table with the flat detector 3D C-arm. The Kirschner wire is navigated via a navigated drill guide. The reference marker is attached to the spina scapulae. (b) Screenshot of a navigated AC joint transfixation. The upper left panel shows the aiming trajectory; the other panels show the planned trajectory.

Figure 2. Radiological analysis with the use of the OsiriX software. Multiplanar reformations are created, and the distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint is measured.

Figure 2. Radiological analysis with the use of the OsiriX software. Multiplanar reformations are created, and the distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint is measured.

Figure 3. Maximum distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint. Statistical analysis revealed significantly lower values in the navigated group.

Figure 3. Maximum distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint. Statistical analysis revealed significantly lower values in the navigated group.

Figure 4. Minimum distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint. Statistical analysis revealed significantly lower values in the navigated group.

Figure 4. Minimum distance of the K-wires from the center of the AC joint. Statistical analysis revealed significantly lower values in the navigated group.

Figure 5. Radiation time in the non-navigated and navigated groups. For the freehand group the radiation time covers only the intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, while the significantly higher radiation time for the navigated group represents 2D fluoroscopic imaging along with the 3D scan.

Figure 5. Radiation time in the non-navigated and navigated groups. For the freehand group the radiation time covers only the intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, while the significantly higher radiation time for the navigated group represents 2D fluoroscopic imaging along with the 3D scan.

Figure 6. Surgery time in the non-navigated and navigated groups. The comparison revealed no statistical differences. The time for the navigated group included 60 seconds for the 3D scan and approximately 1 minute for the transfer of the 3D data from the 3D C-arm to the navigation system.

Figure 6. Surgery time in the non-navigated and navigated groups. The comparison revealed no statistical differences. The time for the navigated group included 60 seconds for the 3D scan and approximately 1 minute for the transfer of the 3D data from the 3D C-arm to the navigation system.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.