1,294
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A comparison of two surgical approaches in functional neurosurgery: individualized versus conventional stereotactic frames

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 34-40 | Received 24 Jul 2014, Accepted 02 Jul 2015, Published online: 20 Aug 2015

Figures & data

Table 1. Baseline patient data.

Table 2. Surgical data of electrode and generator placement.

Figure 1. Comparison of LED in both groups showing a significant decrease of dosage in all postoperative time intervals (p ≤ 0.01**).

Figure 1. Comparison of LED in both groups showing a significant decrease of dosage in all postoperative time intervals (p ≤ 0.01**).

Figure 2. Pre- and postoperative UPDRS in both groups, depending on time course (preoperative, 3, 6 and 12 months after STN-DBS; p ≤ 0.01**; p ≤ 0.05*). Improvement of motor functionality is comparable in conventional stereotactic group (group I) and Starfix® miniframe group (group II).

Figure 2. Pre- and postoperative UPDRS in both groups, depending on time course (preoperative, 3, 6 and 12 months after STN-DBS; p ≤ 0.01**; p ≤ 0.05*). Improvement of motor functionality is comparable in conventional stereotactic group (group I) and Starfix® miniframe group (group II).

Figure 3. Reduction in L-Dopa dose in both groups is significant (p ≤ 0.01**) in the postoperative course 3, 6 and 12 months after DBS compared to initial preoperative L-Dopa dose. postop, postoperatively.

Figure 3. Reduction in L-Dopa dose in both groups is significant (p ≤ 0.01**) in the postoperative course 3, 6 and 12 months after DBS compared to initial preoperative L-Dopa dose. postop, postoperatively.

Table 3. Pre- and postoperative medication and UPDRS data showing the stimulation effect in conventional and Starfix® miniframe group during the 1 year follow-up.