Essential features influencing collaboration in team-based non-specific back pain rehabilitation: Findings from a mixed methods study

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flow chart of the inclusion procedure.

Table 1. Information about the participants in the quantitative part of the project.

Information about the participants	n (%)
Age
20–30 years	24 (6)
31–50 years	171 (46)
51 years or older	180 (48)
Gender
Female	301 (80)
Male	76 (20)
Profession
Occupational therapist	66 (18)
Physician	48 (13)
Psychologist	42 (11)
Coordinator	23 (6)
Physiotherapist	115 (31)
Nurse	16 (4)
Social worker	31 (8)
Other	34 (9)

Table 2. Amount of working time spent on team-based back pain rehabilitation.

	Physiotherapist (n = 115)	Occupational therapist (n = 66)	Physician (n = 48)	Psychologist (n = 42)	Social worker (n = 30)	Coordinator (n = 23)	Nurse (n = 16)
Less than 25%	56 (49)	28 (42)	30 (63)	24 (57)	20 (65)	10 (44)	3 (19)
25–50%	34 (30)	23 (35)	11 (23)	9 (21)	7 (23)	10 (44)	6 (38)
51–75%	10 (9)	6 (9)	6 (12)	5 (12)	2 (6)	1 (4)	4 (25)
More than 75%	15 (13)	8 (12)	1 (2)	4 (10)	1 (3)	2 (8)	3 (19)
Missing		1 (1)			1 (3)

Table 3. Information about the participants’ characteristics in the qualitative part of the project.

	Participants (n = 17) mean (range)
Information about the participants
Age (year)	52 (32–65)
Gender (female/male)	13/4
Years of experience within the profession	22 (2–38)
Years of experience in pain rehabilitation	8 (1–26)
Information about the team
Primary health care/specialised care	13/4
Number of people working in the team	4 (3–5)
Number of years the team has been established	3.5 (2–6)