354
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Antidepressant monotherapy compared with combinations of antidepressants in the treatment of resistant depressive patients: A randomized, open-label study

, , , , , & show all
Pages 35-43 | Received 22 Nov 2011, Accepted 20 Feb 2012, Published online: 10 Apr 2012
 

Abstract

Objective. This randomized, 6-week, open-label study compared efficacy of CAD and antidepressant monotherapies (ADM) that had been chosen according to clinical judgment of the attending psychiatrist. Methods. A total of 60 inpatients (intent-to-treat analysis) with depressive disorder (≥ 1 unsuccessful antidepressant treatment) were randomly assigned to the interventions. The responders who completed the acute phase of study, were evaluated for relapse within 2 months of follow-up treatment. The primary outcome measure was change in the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and response was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction of MADRS score. Results. Mean changes in total MADRS score from baseline to week 6 for patients in both treatment modalities were not different (ADM = 13.2 ± 8.6 points; CAD = 14.5 ± 9.5 points; P = 0.58). The analysis of covariance performed for significantly higher value of imipramine equivalent dose in CAD group showed only a non-significant between-group difference for total MADRS change (P = 0.17). There were also no differences between groups in response rate (ADM = 48%; CAD = 58%) and number of drop-outs in acute treatment as well as proportion of responders’ relapses in the follow-up. Conclusion. Both treatment modalities produced clinically relevant reduction of depressive symptomatology in acute treatment of patients with resistant depression and their effect was comparable.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms Kveta Vonaskova and Ms Jolana Sediva for administrative and technical support.

Statement of Interest

This study was supported by a grant from Internal Grant Agency of Ministry of Health of Czech Republic No. NS 10368-3. MB, TN, PS, JC, JK and MK have no conflict of interest. CH: Clinical trials: coordinator of a multicentric study for Servier. Consultant: Advisory board member, Lilly and BMS. Grant: Lilly. Paid lectures for: Lilly, Janssen Cilag, BMS, Medicom, Nycomed, Krka. Other: faculty member, Lundbeck International Neuroscience Foundation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 526.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.