Figures & data
Table 1. Characteristics of patients.
Figure 1. Relationship between PV and age. PV showed no correlation with age (r = 0.071, p = 0.290, N = 226). However, in patients under 70 years old, there was a significant positive correlation between PV and age (r = 0.284, p = 0.008, N = 85).
![Figure 1. Relationship between PV and age. PV showed no correlation with age (r = 0.071, p = 0.290, N = 226). However, in patients under 70 years old, there was a significant positive correlation between PV and age (r = 0.284, p = 0.008, N = 85).](/cms/asset/f1de665d-b683-4394-a667-7f93c28957ad/itam_a_1162783_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 3. Pearson correlations between PV (all, ≤25, >25) and the variables.
Figure 2. Correlation between PV and sex hormones. (a) PV and testosterone (r = 0.149, p = 0.025), (b) PV and E2 (r = 0.112, p = 0.094), (c) PV and DHEAS (r = −0.071, p = 0.290). PV significantly correlated with testosterone. N = 226.
![Figure 2. Correlation between PV and sex hormones. (a) PV and testosterone (r = 0.149, p = 0.025), (b) PV and E2 (r = 0.112, p = 0.094), (c) PV and DHEAS (r = −0.071, p = 0.290). PV significantly correlated with testosterone. N = 226.](/cms/asset/732a27c5-28f1-4868-8e5c-4ae2ef480836/itam_a_1162783_f0002_c.jpg)