77
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Naming Aspergillus species: progress towards one name for each species

Pages S70-S76 | Received 26 Mar 2010, Accepted 24 Jun 2010, Published online: 18 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

The nomenclature of fungi is governed by the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. That Code is revised at each International Botanical Congress. This Code has permitted most fungi expressing both sexual and asexual states (i.e., pleomorphic fungi) to be accorded separate name(s) for the asexual states. Prior to 1981, the rules on naming pleomorphic fungi had become complicated and were not being applied consistently by mycologists. The changes made in 1981 simplified procedures but resulted in numerous name changes in Aspergillus. Molecular data in particular can now resolve the phylogenetic position of a fungus regardless of whether it expresses sexual or asexual structures. A growing consensus now wishes to either remove entirely or drastically amend the provision to permit separate names to be used for different states of the same species. Some initial changes towards that eventual goal were made at the 2005 International Botanical Congress, and a Special Committee then appointed is debating the most appropriate action to take. In the interim, in order to minimize confusion, mycologists working with Aspergillus and other affected genera are urged to refrain from both introducing new scientific names for further states of already known species, and also from using any such names proposed.

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to Professor David Denning for inviting me to contribute to the 4th Advances Against Aspergillosis conference in Rome, to the organisers for securing the financial support that made my participation possible, and my wife, Patricia E. J. Hawksworth, for help in rendering the text intelligible to non-nomenclaturalists.

Declaration of interest: The author reports no conflict of interest. The author alone is responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Note

1. That work was updated in 2000 [Citation46,Citation47], but the updated version has not as yet been formally proposed for protection under the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, and so does not have the same nomenclatural standing at this time.

This paper was first published online on Early online on 20 August 2010.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.