Figures & data
Figure 1. Effect of intraperitoneally administration of morphine (Mor.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 ml/kg body wt. on first-phase of formalin-induced pain. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.
![Figure 1. Effect of intraperitoneally administration of morphine (Mor.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 ml/kg body wt. on first-phase of formalin-induced pain. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.](/cms/asset/8f20c540-b807-420f-ac04-ed8525bae6ef/iphb_a_600318_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Effect of intraperitoneally administration of morphine (Mor.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 ml/kg body wt. on second-phase of formalin-induced pain. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.
![Figure 2. Effect of intraperitoneally administration of morphine (Mor.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 ml/kg body wt. on second-phase of formalin-induced pain. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.](/cms/asset/59e1367b-cdc2-4c75-9ce3-c2f0d9222ee9/iphb_a_600318_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Effect of the intraperitoneally administration of morphine (Mor.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 on hot plate test. Thermal antinociceptive latency before, and at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after the treatment was measured. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.
![Figure 3. Effect of the intraperitoneally administration of morphine (Mor.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 on hot plate test. Thermal antinociceptive latency before, and at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after the treatment was measured. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.](/cms/asset/9d331280-d824-4615-9aac-e30b74a0f02e/iphb_a_600318_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. Effect of intraperitoneally administration of indomethacin (Indo.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 ml/kg body wt. on acetic acid-induced writhing response in mice. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.
![Figure 4. Effect of intraperitoneally administration of indomethacin (Indo.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 ml/kg body wt. on acetic acid-induced writhing response in mice. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.](/cms/asset/8b1c8caa-5480-41a9-b618-ecc88bb2f8b9/iphb_a_600318_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. Effect of intraperitoneally administration of dexamethasone (Dex.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 ml/kg body wt. on weight ear edema induced by xylene in mice. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.
![Figure 5. Effect of intraperitoneally administration of dexamethasone (Dex.) and olive oil at doses of 1, 5 and 10 ml/kg body wt. on weight ear edema induced by xylene in mice. Each column represents mean ± SEM for eight mice. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 different from control group. Intact animals served as controls.](/cms/asset/eceb59fd-d5a0-4940-8b00-f72f46b47602/iphb_a_600318_f0005_b.gif)