Figures & data
Figure 2. Effects of DMF, EAF, EE, HE, and GFC on SOD activities in rat hippocampus. Male rats (250–280 g; 2 months old) were treated with a single dose of DMF (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), EAF (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), EE (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), HE (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), GFC (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), and the vehicle (Tween 80 0.05% dissolved in 0.9% saline) (i.p., n = 12, Control). Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. for the number of animals shown above in parenthesis. Results were expressed as U/mg of protein. The Student–Newman–Keuls t-test was used for multiple comparisons of means of two groups of data. Differences in experimental groups were determined by two-tailed analysis of variance; ap < 0.05, when compared to vehicle group (ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls as post hoc t-test); bp < 0.05, when compared to DMF group (ANOVA and Student–Newman as post hoc t-test); cp < 0.05, when compared to EAF group (ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls as post hoc t-test); dp < 0.05, when compared to EE group (ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls as post hoc t-test).
![Figure 2. Effects of DMF, EAF, EE, HE, and GFC on SOD activities in rat hippocampus. Male rats (250–280 g; 2 months old) were treated with a single dose of DMF (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), EAF (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), EE (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), HE (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), GFC (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), and the vehicle (Tween 80 0.05% dissolved in 0.9% saline) (i.p., n = 12, Control). Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. for the number of animals shown above in parenthesis. Results were expressed as U/mg of protein. The Student–Newman–Keuls t-test was used for multiple comparisons of means of two groups of data. Differences in experimental groups were determined by two-tailed analysis of variance; ap < 0.05, when compared to vehicle group (ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls as post hoc t-test); bp < 0.05, when compared to DMF group (ANOVA and Student–Newman as post hoc t-test); cp < 0.05, when compared to EAF group (ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls as post hoc t-test); dp < 0.05, when compared to EE group (ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls as post hoc t-test).](/cms/asset/c8943f78-dc72-490f-89b8-49ce8a14fc11/iphb_a_611146_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3 Effects. of DMF, EAF, EE, HE, and GFC on CAT activities in rat hippocampus. Male rats (250–280g; 2 months old) were treated with a single dose of DMF (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), EAF (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), EE (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), HE (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), GFC (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), and the vehicle (Tween 80 0.05% dissolved in 0.9% saline) (i.p., n = 12, Control). Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. for the number of animals shown inside in parenthesis. Results were expressed as mmol/min/mg of protein. The Student–Newman–Keuls t-test was used for multiple comparisons of means of two groups of data. Differences in experimental groups were determined by two-tailed analysis of variance.
![Figure 3 Effects. of DMF, EAF, EE, HE, and GFC on CAT activities in rat hippocampus. Male rats (250–280g; 2 months old) were treated with a single dose of DMF (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), EAF (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), EE (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), HE (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), GFC (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., n = 9), and the vehicle (Tween 80 0.05% dissolved in 0.9% saline) (i.p., n = 12, Control). Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. for the number of animals shown inside in parenthesis. Results were expressed as mmol/min/mg of protein. The Student–Newman–Keuls t-test was used for multiple comparisons of means of two groups of data. Differences in experimental groups were determined by two-tailed analysis of variance.](/cms/asset/1b862bb4-7ad5-4a75-910f-52bf59491f35/iphb_a_611146_f0003_b.gif)