Figures & data
Figure 2. The expression levels of the drug resistance genes CDR1, CDR2, MDR1, FLU1 and ERG11 in fluconazole-sensitive CA-3 cells that were either treated with FLC and/or TET relative to those in untreated cells. The ratios represent the mean ± standard deviations for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus control cells.
![Figure 2. The expression levels of the drug resistance genes CDR1, CDR2, MDR1, FLU1 and ERG11 in fluconazole-sensitive CA-3 cells that were either treated with FLC and/or TET relative to those in untreated cells. The ratios represent the mean ± standard deviations for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus control cells.](/cms/asset/c88858a2-b611-4d85-8872-ba22bda620aa/iphb_a_764537_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. The expression levels of the drug resistance genes CDR1, CDR2, MDR1, FLU1 and ERG11 in fluconazole-resistant CA-16 cells that were either treated with FLC and/or TET relative to those in untreated cells. The ratios represent the mean ± standard deviations for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus control cells.
![Figure 3. The expression levels of the drug resistance genes CDR1, CDR2, MDR1, FLU1 and ERG11 in fluconazole-resistant CA-16 cells that were either treated with FLC and/or TET relative to those in untreated cells. The ratios represent the mean ± standard deviations for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus control cells.](/cms/asset/23eedf67-5075-4b64-84ae-61faac829091/iphb_a_764537_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Intracellular ATP content in fluconazole-sensitive CA-3 and resistant CA-16 cells that were either treated with FLC and/or TET or left as untreated controls. ATP levels represent the mean ± standard deviations for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus control cells.
![Figure 4. Intracellular ATP content in fluconazole-sensitive CA-3 and resistant CA-16 cells that were either treated with FLC and/or TET or left as untreated controls. ATP levels represent the mean ± standard deviations for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus control cells.](/cms/asset/3a649cf4-439b-4da8-8c41-79269ff1367f/iphb_a_764537_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. The expression levels of the energy metabolism gene ADH1 in fluconazole-sensitive CA-3 and resistant CA-16 cells that were either treated with FLC and/or TET relative to those in untreated cells. The ratios represent the mean ± standard deviations for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus control cells.
![Figure 5. The expression levels of the energy metabolism gene ADH1 in fluconazole-sensitive CA-3 and resistant CA-16 cells that were either treated with FLC and/or TET relative to those in untreated cells. The ratios represent the mean ± standard deviations for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus control cells.](/cms/asset/a8fd066f-b9a1-4064-a11b-61c2999612dd/iphb_a_764537_f0005_b.jpg)