Figures & data
Table I. Biochemical characteristics and eGFR values of the study groups.
Figure 1. Bland-Altman plots showing the bias between the SCr-eGFR and the mean of the two eGFR methods at t1 (A), t2 (B), t3 (C) and t0 (D); Figure 1C is restricted to heart transplant recipients only and Figure 1D is restricted to other cardiac surgical patients only; the lines indicate the mean +/2 2 standard deviations. CysC, cystatin C; SCr, serum creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
![Figure 1. Bland-Altman plots showing the bias between the SCr-eGFR and the mean of the two eGFR methods at t1 (A), t2 (B), t3 (C) and t0 (D); Figure 1C is restricted to heart transplant recipients only and Figure 1D is restricted to other cardiac surgical patients only; the lines indicate the mean +/2 2 standard deviations. CysC, cystatin C; SCr, serum creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.](/cms/asset/84abcd71-f5ea-4ca3-b546-5978b1f17719/icdv_a_725478_f0001_b.gif)
Table II. Correlation coefficients of 1,25(OH)2D with CysC-eGFR and SCr-eGFR in the two study groups at different time points.