Figures & data
Figure 1. Representative histology of a remote intramyocardial artery of a normal heart (A), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI; B), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction (IRI + MI; C), and a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S; D) 2 days after reperfusion simulating resuscitation. X40. Note edema of intramyocardial artery shown as vacuolization of vessel wall in C (small arrows).
![Figure 1. Representative histology of a remote intramyocardial artery of a normal heart (A), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI; B), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction (IRI + MI; C), and a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S; D) 2 days after reperfusion simulating resuscitation. X40. Note edema of intramyocardial artery shown as vacuolization of vessel wall in C (small arrows).](/cms/asset/f57abbd4-09f8-4367-8e18-ac4301e8d97e/icdv_a_732235_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Relative number of recovered remote intramyocardial artery wall nuclei in grafts with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI, circles), grafts with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction (IRI + MI, boxes), and grafts with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S, triangles). As compared with IRI and IRI + MI, IRI + MI + S have increased relative number of recovered remote intramyocardial artery nuclei 2 days after reperfusion. *p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis. Horizontal bars indicate median.
![Figure 2. Relative number of recovered remote intramyocardial artery wall nuclei in grafts with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI, circles), grafts with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction (IRI + MI, boxes), and grafts with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S, triangles). As compared with IRI and IRI + MI, IRI + MI + S have increased relative number of recovered remote intramyocardial artery nuclei 2 days after reperfusion. *p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis. Horizontal bars indicate median.](/cms/asset/bba02e51-b604-4d03-be25-da36454b10d9/icdv_a_732235_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Representative immunohistochemistry for eNOS of a remote intramyocardial artery of a normal heart (A), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI; B), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction (IRI + MI; C), and a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S; D) 2 days after reperfusion simulating resuscitation. X40. Note intensive positive endothelial staining (arrows) in a remote intramyocardial artery of a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI; B) as compared with grafts with infarction without (IRI + MI; C) or with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S; D).
![Figure 3. Representative immunohistochemistry for eNOS of a remote intramyocardial artery of a normal heart (A), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI; B), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction (IRI + MI; C), and a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S; D) 2 days after reperfusion simulating resuscitation. X40. Note intensive positive endothelial staining (arrows) in a remote intramyocardial artery of a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI; B) as compared with grafts with infarction without (IRI + MI; C) or with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S; D).](/cms/asset/7740d2f6-5d9b-496e-a022-d7aeebbe23d2/icdv_a_732235_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Representative immunohistochemistry for iNOS of a remote intramyocardial artery of a normal heart (A), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI; B), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction (IRI + MI; C), and a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S; D) 2 days after reperfusion simulating resuscitation. X40. Note tendency for decreased positive staining (arrows) in a remote intramyocardial artery of a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S) as compared with grafts without (IRI; B) or with infarction (IRI + MI; C).
![Figure 4. Representative immunohistochemistry for iNOS of a remote intramyocardial artery of a normal heart (A), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury only (IRI; B), a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction (IRI + MI; C), and a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S; D) 2 days after reperfusion simulating resuscitation. X40. Note tendency for decreased positive staining (arrows) in a remote intramyocardial artery of a graft with ischemia-reperfusion injury and myocardial infarction treated with Sildenafil (IRI + MI + S) as compared with grafts without (IRI; B) or with infarction (IRI + MI; C).](/cms/asset/9892174c-1efe-4a63-91b6-72da304c63ea/icdv_a_732235_f0004_b.jpg)