3,275
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Postmarketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 491-498 | Received 07 Sep 2015, Accepted 13 Nov 2015, Published online: 08 Jan 2016

Figures & data

Table 1. Patient demographic and clinical baseline characteristics.

Table 2. Incidence rates of the most commonly reported adverse drug reactions (≥0.5%).

Table 3. Summary and incidences rates of adverse drug reactions of interest.

Figure 1. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed risk factors for all (a) ADRs, (b) serious ADRs, (c) infections, and (d) serious infections. Candidate variables for multivariate analysis were selected among many others based on their degree of clinical significance and the results of the univariate analysis. Variable selection for the final model of the multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by stepwise methods.

Figure 1. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed risk factors for all (a) ADRs, (b) serious ADRs, (c) infections, and (d) serious infections. Candidate variables for multivariate analysis were selected among many others based on their degree of clinical significance and the results of the univariate analysis. Variable selection for the final model of the multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by stepwise methods.

Figure 2. Change in disease activity over time in patients treated with abatacept. The last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) imputation method was used. (a) DAS28 based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). (b) DAS28-ESR changes. (c) DAS28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP). (d) DAS28-CRP changes.

Figure 2. Change in disease activity over time in patients treated with abatacept. The last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) imputation method was used. (a) DAS28 based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). (b) DAS28-ESR changes. (c) DAS28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP). (d) DAS28-CRP changes.

Figure 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed factors associated with improved DAS (DAS28-CRP51.2) in patients with (a) baseline DAS28-CRP45.1, and (b) baseline DAS28-CRP3.2 and 5.1. Candidate variables for multivariate analysis were selected among many others based on their degree of clinical significance and the results of the univariate analysis. Variable selection for the final model of the multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by stepwise methods.

Figure 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed factors associated with improved DAS (DAS28-CRP51.2) in patients with (a) baseline DAS28-CRP45.1, and (b) baseline DAS28-CRP3.2 and 5.1. Candidate variables for multivariate analysis were selected among many others based on their degree of clinical significance and the results of the univariate analysis. Variable selection for the final model of the multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by stepwise methods.
Supplemental material

Supplementary_Figures_1_2.pdf

Download PDF (46.2 KB)

Supplementary_Table_1.pdf

Download PDF (87 KB)