Publication Cover
Human Fertility
an international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 17, 2014 - Issue 4
192
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How do men in the United Kingdom decide to dispose of banked sperm following cancer treatment?

, , , , , & show all
Pages 285-288 | Received 24 Mar 2014, Accepted 24 May 2014, Published online: 10 Sep 2014
 

Abstract

Current policy in the UK recommends that men bank sperm prior to cancer treatment, but very few return to use it for reproductive purposes or agree to elective disposal even when their fertility recovers and their families are complete. We assessed the demographic, medical and psychological variables that influence the decision to dispose by contacting men (n = 499) who banked sperm more than five years previously, and asked them to complete questionnaires about their views on sperm banking, fertility and disposal. From 193 responses (38.7% response rate), 19 men (9.8%) requested disposal within four months of completing the questionnaire. Compared with men who wanted their sperm to remain in storage, they were significantly more confident that their fertility had recovered (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.05–3.03, p = 0.034), saw fertility monitoring (semen analysis) as less important (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.39–0.94, p = 0.026), held more positive attitudes to disposal (OR = 5.71, 95% CI = 2.89–11.27, p < 0.001), were more likely to have experienced adverse treatment side-effects (OR = 4.37, CI = 1.61–11.85, p = 0.004) and had less desire for children in the future (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.26–0.64, p < 0.001). Information about men's reasons to dispose of banked sperm may be helpful in devising new strategies to encourage men to engage with sperm banking clinics and make timely decisions about the fate of their samples.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Debbie Saxton (Sheffield) and Tracey Kohut (Nottingham) for their help with the recruitment procedures. This paper was supported by funding from Cancer Research-UK to CW, AAP and RR (C481/A8141). The views expressed are those of the authors.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no declarations of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.