Effect of input compression and input frequency response on music perception in cochlear implant users

Abstract

Objective: A study was conducted to determine whether modifications to input compression and input frequency response characteristics can improve music-listening satisfaction in cochlear implant users. Design: Experiment 1 compared three pre-processed versions of music and speech stimuli in a laboratory setting: original, compressed, and flattened frequency response. Music excerpts comprised three music genres (classical, country, and jazz), and a running speech excerpt was compared. Experiment 2 implemented a flattened input frequency response in the speech processor program. In a take-home trial, participants compared unaltered and flattened frequency responses. Study sample: Ten and twelve adult Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant users participated in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Results: Experiment 1 revealed a significant preference for music stimuli with a flattened frequency response compared to both original and compressed stimuli, whereas there was a significant preference for the original (rising) frequency response for speech stimuli. Experiment 2 revealed no significant mean preference for the flattened frequency response, with 9 of 11 subjects preferring the rising frequency response. Conclusions: Input compression did not alter music enjoyment. Comparison of the two experiments indicated that individual frequency response preferences may depend on the genre or familiarity, and particularly whether the music contained lyrics.

Key Words::

• Cochlear implant
• music perception
• input compression
• frequency response

Note

Acknowledgements

Some of this work was presented as posters at the British Academy of Audiology Conferences in 2008 in Nottingham UK and 2013 in Manchester, UK. We thank Anisa Visram for her assistance during data collection and Keith Wilbraham and David Starkey for their technical assistance.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The research was financially supported by the University of Manchester. The Bionics Institute acknowledges the support it receives from the Victorian Gover©nment, Australia, through its Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Supplementary material available online

Supplementary Appendices 1 to 6.

Notes

The first and second authors contributed equally to this paper.