797
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Rapid Fall in Lung Density Following Smoking Cessation in COPD

, , , &
Pages 2-7 | Published online: 08 Feb 2011

Figures & data

Table 1  Patient characteristics, LFTs and quantitative CT parameters at inclusion

Table 2  Change in CT lung density and lung function in association with smoking cessation in the whole study population (n = 36)

Figure 1  Effect of smoking cessation on lung density in patients with COPD. Lung density is objectively quantitated from CT scans as PD15 (15th percentile density) in Hounsfield units (HU) and RA-910 (relative area of emphysema below -910 HU), both changed significantly with smoking cessation with a p-value of 0.0002 and 0.003, respectively. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 1  Effect of smoking cessation on lung density in patients with COPD. Lung density is objectively quantitated from CT scans as PD15 (15th percentile density) in Hounsfield units (HU) and RA-910 (relative area of emphysema below -910 HU), both changed significantly with smoking cessation with a p-value of 0.0002 and 0.003, respectively. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 2  Change in CT lung density following smoking cessation in patients with COPD during treatment with ICS (budesonide) or placebo. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 2  Change in CT lung density following smoking cessation in patients with COPD during treatment with ICS (budesonide) or placebo. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 3  Effect of smoking cessation on lung function in patients with COPD. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and diffusion capacity (DLCO) did not change significantly with smoking cessation with a p-value of 0.14 and 0.48, respectively. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 3  Effect of smoking cessation on lung function in patients with COPD. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and diffusion capacity (DLCO) did not change significantly with smoking cessation with a p-value of 0.14 and 0.48, respectively. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 4  Computer-aided comparison of the extent of emphysema before and after smoking cessation. The lung contours are first defined and subsequently aligned. Digital subtraction of the images with colour coding shows the abundance of areas with fall in lung density (blue) in comparison to areas with increase in lung density (yellow) (Citation31).

Figure 4  Computer-aided comparison of the extent of emphysema before and after smoking cessation. The lung contours are first defined and subsequently aligned. Digital subtraction of the images with colour coding shows the abundance of areas with fall in lung density (blue) in comparison to areas with increase in lung density (yellow) (Citation31).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.