374
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Predicting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Hospitalizations Based on Concurrent Influenza Activity

, , , , &
Pages 573-580 | Published online: 02 Jul 2013

Figures & data

Table 1.  Fitted time series regression models with the COPD incidence series as the response series and concurrent influenza activity as the explanatory series

Figure 1.  COPD admissions (upper panel) and influenza admissions (lower panel) by month from January 1998 to July 2010. In the upper panel, prior to 2009, the red series represents the fitted values based on the time series model with concurrent influenza activity as an explanatory variable. After 2009, the dotted red series represents forecasts of COPD admissions with influenza; the dotted blue series represents forecasts of COPD admissions without influenza.

Figure 1.  COPD admissions (upper panel) and influenza admissions (lower panel) by month from January 1998 to July 2010. In the upper panel, prior to 2009, the red series represents the fitted values based on the time series model with concurrent influenza activity as an explanatory variable. After 2009, the dotted red series represents forecasts of COPD admissions with influenza; the dotted blue series represents forecasts of COPD admissions without influenza.

Figure 2.  Time series forecast for the COPD admissions during July 2009 through June 2010. In the upper panel, the black series represents the actual COPD series; the dotted red series represents forecasts of COPD admissions with influenza and the dotted blue series represents forecasts of COPD admissions without influenza. The corresponding influenza series is shown in the lower panel. Importantly, the last 6 months of 2009 include the second wave of the 2009 influenza pandemic. Note: The right vertical axis represents monthly COPD admissions in terms of the percentage of peak monthly COPD admissions during the forecasting period. Thus, the peak month corresponds to 100%. For example, in December 2009, the forecasting error with influenza is roughly 1%, and the error without influenza is approximately 15% (where the percentage is relative to peak admissions during the forecasting period).

Figure 2.  Time series forecast for the COPD admissions during July 2009 through June 2010. In the upper panel, the black series represents the actual COPD series; the dotted red series represents forecasts of COPD admissions with influenza and the dotted blue series represents forecasts of COPD admissions without influenza. The corresponding influenza series is shown in the lower panel. Importantly, the last 6 months of 2009 include the second wave of the 2009 influenza pandemic. Note: The right vertical axis represents monthly COPD admissions in terms of the percentage of peak monthly COPD admissions during the forecasting period. Thus, the peak month corresponds to 100%. For example, in December 2009, the forecasting error with influenza is roughly 1%, and the error without influenza is approximately 15% (where the percentage is relative to peak admissions during the forecasting period).

Figure 3.  Time series forecast for AECOPD admissions during July 2009 through June 2010. In the upper panel, the black series represents the actual AECOPD series; the dotted red series represents forecasts of AECOPD admissions with influenza and the dotted blue series represents forecasts of AECOPD admissions without influenza. The corresponding influenza series is shown in the lower panel. Importantly, the last 6 months of 2009 include the second wave of the 2009 influenza pandemic. Note: The right vertical axis represents monthly AECOPD admissions in terms of the percentage of peak monthly AECOPD admissions during the forecasting period. Thus, the peak month corresponds to 100%. For example, in December 2009, the forecasting error with influenza is roughly 2–3%, and the error without influenza is approximately 15% (where the percentage is relative to peak admissions during the forecasting period).

Figure 3.  Time series forecast for AECOPD admissions during July 2009 through June 2010. In the upper panel, the black series represents the actual AECOPD series; the dotted red series represents forecasts of AECOPD admissions with influenza and the dotted blue series represents forecasts of AECOPD admissions without influenza. The corresponding influenza series is shown in the lower panel. Importantly, the last 6 months of 2009 include the second wave of the 2009 influenza pandemic. Note: The right vertical axis represents monthly AECOPD admissions in terms of the percentage of peak monthly AECOPD admissions during the forecasting period. Thus, the peak month corresponds to 100%. For example, in December 2009, the forecasting error with influenza is roughly 2–3%, and the error without influenza is approximately 15% (where the percentage is relative to peak admissions during the forecasting period).

Table 2.  Attributable risk measures by age group for the four COPD series

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Unknown widget #6172f685-4ab3-49de-a3ba-1ddc57b96120

of type scholix-links