Figures & data
Figure 2. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on PHA-stimulated splenocyte proliferation. Proliferation of naïve cells exposed to 0.5–15 μM of UMB or MG was measured using MTT method. Results are shown as mean SI values ± SD. Values significantly different versus “0” terpenoid control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG significantly differed (p < 0.05) at all doses ≥2.5 µM.
![Figure 2. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on PHA-stimulated splenocyte proliferation. Proliferation of naïve cells exposed to 0.5–15 μM of UMB or MG was measured using MTT method. Results are shown as mean SI values ± SD. Values significantly different versus “0” terpenoid control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG significantly differed (p < 0.05) at all doses ≥2.5 µM.](/cms/asset/9433979d-3bdb-4a2a-a9a8-c2e374415f1e/iimt_a_1043606_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on cytokine production by murine splenocytes. (a) IFNγ and (b) IL-4. Naïve mouse splenocytes were treated with PHA (5 ng/ml) ± 0.5–15 μM of UMB or MG for 72 h at 37 °C before culture supernatants were collected for analysis. Results shown are mean ± SD (pg/ml). Values significantly different vs “0” terpenoid control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG significantly differed (p < 0.05) at all doses ≥5 µM.
![Figure 3. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on cytokine production by murine splenocytes. (a) IFNγ and (b) IL-4. Naïve mouse splenocytes were treated with PHA (5 ng/ml) ± 0.5–15 μM of UMB or MG for 72 h at 37 °C before culture supernatants were collected for analysis. Results shown are mean ± SD (pg/ml). Values significantly different vs “0” terpenoid control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG significantly differed (p < 0.05) at all doses ≥5 µM.](/cms/asset/f1a1b194-053d-4058-9daf-857adb7eae32/iimt_a_1043606_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on peritoneal macrophage viability. Naïve macrophages were cultured with either UMB or MG (5–40 μM) for 24 h before viability was assessed using MTT. Results are shown as mean ± SD (% viability). Values significantly different versus “0” terpenoid control: Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG only significantly differed (p < 0.05) at the two highest doses tested.
![Figure 4. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on peritoneal macrophage viability. Naïve macrophages were cultured with either UMB or MG (5–40 μM) for 24 h before viability was assessed using MTT. Results are shown as mean ± SD (% viability). Values significantly different versus “0” terpenoid control: Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG only significantly differed (p < 0.05) at the two highest doses tested.](/cms/asset/e08e46da-29e9-489c-a8ed-5da5bfe6150e/iimt_a_1043606_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on peritoneal macrophage nitric oxide production. Naïve macrophages were stimulated with LPS (10 ng/ml) and IFNγ (100 ng/ml) ± UMB or MG (5–40 μM) for 24 h at 37 °C before culture supernatants were collected for analysis. Results are shown as mean ± SD (µM). Values significantly different vs “0” terpenoid control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG significantly differed (p < 0.05) at all doses tested.
![Figure 5. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on peritoneal macrophage nitric oxide production. Naïve macrophages were stimulated with LPS (10 ng/ml) and IFNγ (100 ng/ml) ± UMB or MG (5–40 μM) for 24 h at 37 °C before culture supernatants were collected for analysis. Results are shown as mean ± SD (µM). Values significantly different vs “0” terpenoid control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG significantly differed (p < 0.05) at all doses tested.](/cms/asset/bd71eb66-9c89-4a4b-96f6-e61fba510f7e/iimt_a_1043606_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on peritoneal macrophage PGE2 production Naïve macrophages were stimulated with LPS (10 ng/ml) and IFNγ (100 ng/ml) ± UMB or MG (5–40 μM) for 24 h at 37 °C before culture supernatants were collected for analysis. Results are shown as mean ± SD (µM). Values significantly different vs “0” terpenoid control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG significantly differed (p < 0.05) at all doses tested.
![Figure 6. Effect of terpenoid coumarins on peritoneal macrophage PGE2 production Naïve macrophages were stimulated with LPS (10 ng/ml) and IFNγ (100 ng/ml) ± UMB or MG (5–40 μM) for 24 h at 37 °C before culture supernatants were collected for analysis. Results are shown as mean ± SD (µM). Values significantly different vs “0” terpenoid control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Values for a fixed dose of UMB and MG significantly differed (p < 0.05) at all doses tested.](/cms/asset/2fb9034e-13c9-4a4f-89b1-bb5fc2724eb3/iimt_a_1043606_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7. Effect of UMB and MG (10 and 25 μM) on LPS-/IFNγ-induced iNOS, COX-2 and β-actin expression in cultured macrophages. Lysates were prepared from macrophages incubated for 24 h with LPS (10 ng/ml) + IFNγ (100 ng/ml) alone or in combination with test terpenoid coumarins. Cell lysates were then isolated and subjected to Western blot analyses as outlined in Methods. Picture shown is a representative blot from each indicated regimen.
![Figure 7. Effect of UMB and MG (10 and 25 μM) on LPS-/IFNγ-induced iNOS, COX-2 and β-actin expression in cultured macrophages. Lysates were prepared from macrophages incubated for 24 h with LPS (10 ng/ml) + IFNγ (100 ng/ml) alone or in combination with test terpenoid coumarins. Cell lysates were then isolated and subjected to Western blot analyses as outlined in Methods. Picture shown is a representative blot from each indicated regimen.](/cms/asset/80af2b5d-5da0-49c2-a31f-aa13a48895a4/iimt_a_1043606_f0007_b.jpg)