738
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

CpG promoter methylation status is not a prognostic indicator of gene expression in beryllium challenge

, &
Pages 417-427 | Received 23 Jul 2015, Accepted 27 Oct 2015, Published online: 16 Dec 2015

Figures & data

Table 1. Amplification and pyrosequencing primer sets.

Figure 1. TNFα expression (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. H36.12J cells treated with Be expressed 446.90 [± 110.98] pg TNFα/ml, significantly more than produced by H36.12J cells treated with either Al2(SO4)3 239.78 [± 10.85] pg TNFα/ml, Ni(II)Cl2 170.38 [± 19.12] pg TNFα/ml, PBS 122.41 [± 23.23] pg TNFα/ml or NC 152.95 [± 22.01] pg TNFα/ml (p < 0.01). This amount of TNFα was also significantly greater than amounts made by either the H36.12E or P388D.1 cells (p < 0.03) treated with Be.

Figure 1. TNFα expression (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. H36.12J cells treated with Be expressed 446.90 [± 110.98] pg TNFα/ml, significantly more than produced by H36.12J cells treated with either Al2(SO4)3 239.78 [± 10.85] pg TNFα/ml, Ni(II)Cl2 170.38 [± 19.12] pg TNFα/ml, PBS 122.41 [± 23.23] pg TNFα/ml or NC 152.95 [± 22.01] pg TNFα/ml (p < 0.01). This amount of TNFα was also significantly greater than amounts made by either the H36.12E or P388D.1 cells (p < 0.03) treated with Be.

Figure 2. Representative CpG methylation for TNFα (a) and IFNγ (b) (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or a non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. (a) Percentage methylation of TNF1-1 CpG by treatment for each of the three cell types is representative of CpG methylation seen at this site within TNFα promoter region. (b) Percentage methylation observed for the three cell types (by treatment) for the IFN1-1 CpG site is representative of methylation levels observed in the IFNγ promoter region.

Figure 2. Representative CpG methylation for TNFα (a) and IFNγ (b) (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or a non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. (a) Percentage methylation of TNF1-1 CpG by treatment for each of the three cell types is representative of CpG methylation seen at this site within TNFα promoter region. (b) Percentage methylation observed for the three cell types (by treatment) for the IFN1-1 CpG site is representative of methylation levels observed in the IFNγ promoter region.

Table 2. Percentage CpG methylation.

Figure 3. H36.12J percentage TNFα promoter CpG methylation (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or a non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. Percentage methylation observed with each treatment at each of the six TNFα promoter CpG sites investigated showed no significant difference between treatments.

Figure 3. H36.12J percentage TNFα promoter CpG methylation (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or a non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. Percentage methylation observed with each treatment at each of the six TNFα promoter CpG sites investigated showed no significant difference between treatments.

Figure 4. Percentage TNFα promoter CpG methylation (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or a non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. Comparing the levels of CpG promoter methylation between the three mouse cell lines cultured with 100 μM BeSO4 overnight revealed significantly less (p < 0.005) methylation at CpG site TNF 4-1 in H36.12J cells when compared to in P388D.1 cells, the parental cell line.

Figure 4. Percentage TNFα promoter CpG methylation (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or a non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. Comparing the levels of CpG promoter methylation between the three mouse cell lines cultured with 100 μM BeSO4 overnight revealed significantly less (p < 0.005) methylation at CpG site TNF 4-1 in H36.12J cells when compared to in P388D.1 cells, the parental cell line.

Figure 5. Comparisons of TNFα and IFNγ CpG percentage methylation (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. Comparison of overall percentage CpG methylation for each promoter region separated by cell type, regardless of cell treatment, shows percentage CpG methylation of the TNFα promoter was much lower than that of the IFNγ promoter within each cell type.

Figure 5. Comparisons of TNFα and IFNγ CpG percentage methylation (mean ± standard deviation) of cells treated with 100 μM BeSO4, 100 μM CoCl2, 100 μM Ni(II)Cl2, 100 μM Al2(SO4)3, 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or non-addition control (NC); n = 3 experiments. Comparison of overall percentage CpG methylation for each promoter region separated by cell type, regardless of cell treatment, shows percentage CpG methylation of the TNFα promoter was much lower than that of the IFNγ promoter within each cell type.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.