518
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

In vitro comparison of the effects of rough and polished stem surface finish on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty

, , &
Pages 144-149 | Accepted 20 Oct 2008, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

Figures & data

Figure 1. Cross-sectional view of HAPS apparatus with model stem in situ and showing sampling sites at the cement mantle-stem interface.

Figure 1. Cross-sectional view of HAPS apparatus with model stem in situ and showing sampling sites at the cement mantle-stem interface.

Figure 2. Typical pressure waves generated by a polished stem in a conforming cement mantle at 2 different sites, together with the stem loading schedule. The ΔPmax is the maximum pressure range developed over 1 load cycle (measured in pascals). The typical pressure wave is either dominated by a sine wave (A) or a bi-modal spiked waveform (B). The peaks of the sine wave (arrows 1 and 2) tend not to be synchronized with the peak of the applied axial load; however, the peaks in the bi-modal spiked waveform are synchronised with the torque loading.

Figure 2. Typical pressure waves generated by a polished stem in a conforming cement mantle at 2 different sites, together with the stem loading schedule. The ΔPmax is the maximum pressure range developed over 1 load cycle (measured in pascals). The typical pressure wave is either dominated by a sine wave (A) or a bi-modal spiked waveform (B). The peaks of the sine wave (arrows 1 and 2) tend not to be synchronized with the peak of the applied axial load; however, the peaks in the bi-modal spiked waveform are synchronised with the torque loading.

Figure 3. Comparison of the pressure waves of one load cycle generated by polished and rough stems taken at 5 sampling sites at the start of loading (dashed lines) and after 1 million load cycles (solid lines).

Figure 3. Comparison of the pressure waves of one load cycle generated by polished and rough stems taken at 5 sampling sites at the start of loading (dashed lines) and after 1 million load cycles (solid lines).

Figure 4. Average of median ΔPmax recorded at the start of the study and after completing 1 million cycles with both polished (A) and rough (B) stems (3 mantles were studied in each group).

Figure 4. Average of median ΔPmax recorded at the start of the study and after completing 1 million cycles with both polished (A) and rough (B) stems (3 mantles were studied in each group).

The increase in recoverable rotational and axial micromotion in polished and rough stems between the start of loading and when 1 million load cycles had been completed

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.