1,240
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with severely dysplastic hips and a previous Schanz osteotomy of the femur

Techniques, pitfalls, and long-term outcome

, , , , &
Pages 263-269 | Accepted 03 Nov 2008, Published online: 26 Oct 2009

Figures & data

Table 1. Classification of the hips according to Eftekhar (1978) and Hartofilakidis et al. (1996)

Table 2. Clinical characteristics at the time of primary arthroplasty

Figure 1. A 54-year-old woman who had high congenital dislocation of both hips. At the age of 17, she had undergone a bilateral high-seated Schanz osteotomy to reduce limp. A. Preoperatively. B. 9 years after a cementless total hip arthroplasty of the left hip and 8 years after a similar procedure on the left hip. Both hips underwent femoral shortening and advancement of the greater trochanter. The leg-length discrepancy was 1 cm (the left side being shorter). There were no radiographic signs of loosening of the components and no signs of polyethylene wear.

Figure 1. A 54-year-old woman who had high congenital dislocation of both hips. At the age of 17, she had undergone a bilateral high-seated Schanz osteotomy to reduce limp. A. Preoperatively. B. 9 years after a cementless total hip arthroplasty of the left hip and 8 years after a similar procedure on the left hip. Both hips underwent femoral shortening and advancement of the greater trochanter. The leg-length discrepancy was 1 cm (the left side being shorter). There were no radiographic signs of loosening of the components and no signs of polyethylene wear.

Figure 2. Osteotomies used for various deformities of the femur. The femoral shaft is usually transected distal to the lesser trochanter, as shown by the transverse solid line in (A). A dotted line demonstrates the most distal possible level of the osteotomy. A. Proximal shortening osteotomy with distal advancement of the greater trochanter (vertical solid line) in hips with a previous proximal Schanz osteotomy. B. Segmental shortening with angular correction for hips with a previous, more distal Schanz osteotomy. Copyright for the illustrations in this figure is owned by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. (published in Eskelinen et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with high congenital hip dislocation, J Bone Joint Surg Am. Citation2006; 88: 80-91). Reproduced with permission.

Figure 2. Osteotomies used for various deformities of the femur. The femoral shaft is usually transected distal to the lesser trochanter, as shown by the transverse solid line in (A). A dotted line demonstrates the most distal possible level of the osteotomy. A. Proximal shortening osteotomy with distal advancement of the greater trochanter (vertical solid line) in hips with a previous proximal Schanz osteotomy. B. Segmental shortening with angular correction for hips with a previous, more distal Schanz osteotomy. Copyright for the illustrations in this figure is owned by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. (published in Eskelinen et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with high congenital hip dislocation, J Bone Joint Surg Am. Citation2006; 88: 80-91). Reproduced with permission.

Table 3. Prosthetic components

Table 4. Clinical results of intact and revised hips

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the press-fit porous-coated Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the CDH femoral compo-acetabular components, with cup revision because of aseptic loosennents, with stem revision for any reason as the endpoint. CI: confi-ing and cup revision for any reason as the endpoints. CI: confidence dence interval. interval.

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the press-fit porous-coated Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the CDH femoral compo-acetabular components, with cup revision because of aseptic loosennents, with stem revision for any reason as the endpoint. CI: confi-ing and cup revision for any reason as the endpoints. CI: confidence dence interval. interval.

Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the CDH femoral components, with stem revision for any reason as the endpoint. CI: confi-dence interval.

Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the CDH femoral components, with stem revision for any reason as the endpoint. CI: confi-dence interval.

Table 5. Complications

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.