1,400
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Anti-sclerostin antibody and mechanical loading appear to influence metaphyseal bone independently in rats

, , , &
Pages 628-632 | Received 18 Mar 2011, Accepted 12 Jun 2011, Published online: 24 Nov 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1. Region of interest used for µCT analysis. Frontal and transverse sections of the proximal tibia (epiphysis removed) from saline-treated (A) and Scl-Ab-treated (B) weight-bearing animals. A 1.5-mm long region in the metaphysis was chosen (dashed lines). In this region, only the trabecular bone was evaluated (white trace). This region was situated away from the screw (*) so that it would not be influenced by any bone formation around the screw.

Figure 1. Region of interest used for µCT analysis. Frontal and transverse sections of the proximal tibia (epiphysis removed) from saline-treated (A) and Scl-Ab-treated (B) weight-bearing animals. A 1.5-mm long region in the metaphysis was chosen (dashed lines). In this region, only the trabecular bone was evaluated (white trace). This region was situated away from the screw (*) so that it would not be influenced by any bone formation around the screw.

Figure 2. Effect of treatment with anti-sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab) on screw fixation. A. Peak pull-out force. B. Pull-out energy. C. Stiffness. Compared to controls, Scl-Ab treatment significantly increased peak force (a: p = 0.01; b: p < 0.001) and energy (c: p = 0.02; d: p < 0.001) both with and without loading. Stiffness was significantly increased in an unloaded setting (e: p = 0.03). Unloading had a large effect on screw fixation, causing a large reduction in peak force (p < 0.001).

Figure 2. Effect of treatment with anti-sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab) on screw fixation. A. Peak pull-out force. B. Pull-out energy. C. Stiffness. Compared to controls, Scl-Ab treatment significantly increased peak force (a: p = 0.01; b: p < 0.001) and energy (c: p = 0.02; d: p < 0.001) both with and without loading. Stiffness was significantly increased in an unloaded setting (e: p = 0.03). Unloading had a large effect on screw fixation, causing a large reduction in peak force (p < 0.001).

Figure 3. Effect of anti-sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab) on trabecular bone volume in the proximal tibia, as measured by µCT. A. Bone volume fraction. B. Trabecular number. C. Trabecular Thickness. D. Trabecular separation. Botox treatment significantly reduced BV/TV, Tb.N, and Tb.Th compared to loaded controls (p < 0.001). Antibody treatment increased BV/TV both in the loaded and unloaded tibia, but only the increase in the unloaded tibia was significant (a: p = 0.03). Trabecular thickness was also significantly increased, however (b, c: p < 0.001).

Figure 3. Effect of anti-sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab) on trabecular bone volume in the proximal tibia, as measured by µCT. A. Bone volume fraction. B. Trabecular number. C. Trabecular Thickness. D. Trabecular separation. Botox treatment significantly reduced BV/TV, Tb.N, and Tb.Th compared to loaded controls (p < 0.001). Antibody treatment increased BV/TV both in the loaded and unloaded tibia, but only the increase in the unloaded tibia was significant (a: p = 0.03). Trabecular thickness was also significantly increased, however (b, c: p < 0.001).