3,731
Views
132
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Bisphosphonates and femoral fractures

Risk of atypical femoral fracture during and after bisphosphonate use

Full report of a nationwide study

, , &
Pages 100-107 | Received 29 Apr 2014, Accepted 04 Jun 2014, Published online: 13 Jan 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Identification of atypical femoral fractures in the study population. Patients from 2008 were women only. a Mechanically altered femurs include patients with knee and hip prostheses, retained plates, screws, intramedullary nails, joint arthrodeses, and other conditions.

Figure 1. Identification of atypical femoral fractures in the study population. Patients from 2008 were women only. a Mechanically altered femurs include patients with knee and hip prostheses, retained plates, screws, intramedullary nails, joint arthrodeses, and other conditions.

Table 2. Age-adjusted relative risk (RR) and absolute risk (AR), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), of atypical femoral fracture associated with use of bisphosphonate in women and men 55 years of age or older, during the 3-year period 2008–2010

Figure 2. Age-adjusted relative risk of atypical femoral fracture in women, by duration of use compared to non-use. Relative risk estimates (dots) with error bars representing 95% CIs.

Figure 2. Age-adjusted relative risk of atypical femoral fracture in women, by duration of use compared to non-use. Relative risk estimates (dots) with error bars representing 95% CIs.

Table 3. Characteristics of stress fracture cases and controls with ordinary femoral shaft fractures

Table 4. Odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for femoral stress fractures associated with bisphosphonate use

Figure 3. Schematic graph of risk over time, with arbitrary units. Blue curve: risk of fragility fracture; red curve: total fracture risk; dashed red line: projected total risk without cessation. The curves are based on the assumption that the protective effect against ordinary (non-atypical) fractures has a longer half-life than the risk of atypical fracture.

Figure 3. Schematic graph of risk over time, with arbitrary units. Blue curve: risk of fragility fracture; red curve: total fracture risk; dashed red line: projected total risk without cessation. The curves are based on the assumption that the protective effect against ordinary (non-atypical) fractures has a longer half-life than the risk of atypical fracture.
Supplemental material

IORT_A_1004149_SM8548.pdf

Download PDF (31.3 KB)