402
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Scientific Reports

Prenatal compared with postnatal cleft diagnosis: What do the parents think?

, , , &
Pages 235-241 | Accepted 13 Apr 2012, Published online: 22 Aug 2012
 

Abstract

Since the 1980s, prenatal detection of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CLP) is possible with a transabdominal ultrasound. The improvement of prenatal detection has resulted in an increased demand for prenatal information and counselling. The aim of this study was to, by means of a questionnaire, evaluate how families, who received the diagnosis prenatally and postnatally, respectively, think about the prenatal and postnatal consultation. Patients referred prenatally or postnatally to the department, due to CLP, between January 2006 and September 2010 were included in the study. Thirty-six of the families (95%) answered the questionnaire concerning prenatal counselling. A total of 46 parents (82%) answered the questionnaire concerning postnatal counselling. In the prenatal group, half of the patients were first informed by the ultrasound unit, whereas 16% were initially informed by the cleft team. More of the families that were informed by the cleft team were content with the information received than the families who were informed by the ultrasound unit. The majority of the families were satisfied with the structure of the consultation. Most of the patients in the postnatal group were happy with the postnatal consultation. Most of the parents in the postnatal group would have wanted to know about the diagnosis prenatally. The great majority of the parents was happy with the consultation with the cleft team and thought that they received enough information. However, the information received at the referring units could be improved. Parents seem to want information on the cleft diagnosis and its treatment as soon as possible.

Acknowledgements

We thank the parents of children born with cleft during the years of 2006–2010 for participating in our survey.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.