925
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A new pyruvate oxidase biosensor based on 3-mercaptopropionic acid/6-aminocaproic acid modified gold electrode

&
Pages 418-422 | Received 12 Mar 2013, Accepted 12 Jun 2013, Published online: 24 Jul 2013

Figures & data

Scheme 1. The reaction mechanism between the redox center of POX and the electrode surface.

Scheme 1. The reaction mechanism between the redox center of POX and the electrode surface.

Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of bare AuE (a), AuE/3-MPA/6-ACA (b), AuE/3-MPA/6-ACA/POX/GA in the absence of pyruvate (c) and AuE/ 3-MPA/6-ACA/POX/GA in the presence of pyruvate (d) in phosphate buffer (pH 6.0, 50 mM containing 0.1 M KCl and 5.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6) at a scan rate of 50 mVs− 1 vs. Ag/AgCl.

Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of bare AuE (a), AuE/3-MPA/6-ACA (b), AuE/3-MPA/6-ACA/POX/GA in the absence of pyruvate (c) and AuE/ 3-MPA/6-ACA/POX/GA in the presence of pyruvate (d) in phosphate buffer (pH 6.0, 50 mM containing 0.1 M KCl and 5.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6) at a scan rate of 50 mVs− 1 vs. Ag/AgCl.

Figure 2. DP Voltammograms obtained for different concentration of pyruvate; a (0 μM), b (2.5 μM), c (10 μM), d (20 μM), e (30 μM), f (40 μM), g (50 μM). Inset shows the relationship between catalytic currents and pyruvate concentrations. Conditions: pH 6.0, 50 mM phosphate buffer (containing 0.1 M KCl and 5.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6) at 30°C. The percentage of glutaraldehyde and the activity of pyruvate oxidase were kept constant to be 2.5% and 0.356 UmL− 1, respectively.

Figure 2. DP Voltammograms obtained for different concentration of pyruvate; a (0 μM), b (2.5 μM), c (10 μM), d (20 μM), e (30 μM), f (40 μM), g (50 μM). Inset shows the relationship between catalytic currents and pyruvate concentrations. Conditions: pH 6.0, 50 mM phosphate buffer (containing 0.1 M KCl and 5.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6) at 30°C. The percentage of glutaraldehyde and the activity of pyruvate oxidase were kept constant to be 2.5% and 0.356 UmL− 1, respectively.

Figure 3. Current–time curves obtained with the biosensor upon successive addition of 1 mL 30 μM pyruvate. Inset shows the relationship between catalytic currents and pyruvate concentrations. Conditions: pH 6.0, 50 mM phosphate buffer (containing 0.1 M KCl and 5.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6) at the applied potential of 30 mV. The percentage of glutaraldehyde and the activity of pyruvate oxidase were kept constant to be 2.5% and 0.356 UmL− 1, respectively.

Figure 3. Current–time curves obtained with the biosensor upon successive addition of 1 mL 30 μM pyruvate. Inset shows the relationship between catalytic currents and pyruvate concentrations. Conditions: pH 6.0, 50 mM phosphate buffer (containing 0.1 M KCl and 5.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6) at the applied potential of 30 mV. The percentage of glutaraldehyde and the activity of pyruvate oxidase were kept constant to be 2.5% and 0.356 UmL− 1, respectively.

Table I. Comparison of performances of some biosensors developed for determination of pyruvate.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.