Figures & data
Figure 2. (A) SEM image of n-HA/PLLA/Fe2O3 composite (50×): uniform and interconnected pores, with pore size as large as 500 μm. B) SEM of n-HA/PLLA/Fe2O3 composite (5000×): reticulate structure, rough inner wall of pores, interconnection between the pores, porosity 85%.
![Figure 2. (A) SEM image of n-HA/PLLA/Fe2O3 composite (50×): uniform and interconnected pores, with pore size as large as 500 μm. B) SEM of n-HA/PLLA/Fe2O3 composite (5000×): reticulate structure, rough inner wall of pores, interconnection between the pores, porosity 85%.](/cms/asset/04978e47-ccdb-43ac-8785-c2fcf01bb440/ianb_a_1029621_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Under the microscope, the rat OBs showed oval shape, spindle shape, triangular shape, or the shape of an irregular polygon. (A) P0, (B) P1, (C) P3.
![Figure 3. Under the microscope, the rat OBs showed oval shape, spindle shape, triangular shape, or the shape of an irregular polygon. (A) P0, (B) P1, (C) P3.](/cms/asset/3bee03cc-6333-450c-9cec-ee6a2f3019b4/ianb_a_1029621_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. There was no obvious difference in cell proliferation rate on the surface of the scaffold (Group A) and on the plastic culture plate (Group B) (P > 0.05).
![Figure 4. There was no obvious difference in cell proliferation rate on the surface of the scaffold (Group A) and on the plastic culture plate (Group B) (P > 0.05).](/cms/asset/dc4b2b21-1ef4-41e8-9d3b-db78bace7aa3/ianb_a_1029621_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. (A), (B), and (C) are SEM images (5000×) of the co-culture of the n-HA/PLLA/Fe2O3 composite and rat OBs at weeks 1, 2 and 3, respectively. With the passage of time, more osteoblasts adhered to the scaffold.
![Figure 5. (A), (B), and (C) are SEM images (5000×) of the co-culture of the n-HA/PLLA/Fe2O3 composite and rat OBs at weeks 1, 2 and 3, respectively. With the passage of time, more osteoblasts adhered to the scaffold.](/cms/asset/2b1ac90b-1693-4144-83d2-f12eefb63f31/ianb_a_1029621_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. At weeks 1, 2, and 3, the expression of Col-I was increased and the difference was of statistical significance (P < 0.05). The expression of OCN did not show obvious difference (P > 0.05). At week 1, the expression of Col-I was not significantly different from that of P0 (P > 0.05). At weeks 2 and 3, the expression of Col-I was always higher than that of P0 (P < 0.05). At weeks 1, 2, and 3, the expression of OCN was not significantly different from that of P0.
![Figure 6. At weeks 1, 2, and 3, the expression of Col-I was increased and the difference was of statistical significance (P < 0.05). The expression of OCN did not show obvious difference (P > 0.05). At week 1, the expression of Col-I was not significantly different from that of P0 (P > 0.05). At weeks 2 and 3, the expression of Col-I was always higher than that of P0 (P < 0.05). At weeks 1, 2, and 3, the expression of OCN was not significantly different from that of P0.](/cms/asset/e21c4aaf-c5bb-421a-8c72-64cdb344d97b/ianb_a_1029621_f0006_b.gif)