Figures & data
Figure 1. Model schematic. CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; Tx, treatment; EDSS, expanded disability status scale; MS, multiple sclerosis.
![Figure 1. Model schematic. CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; Tx, treatment; EDSS, expanded disability status scale; MS, multiple sclerosis.](/cms/asset/b22ecb77-a747-4a59-b4f5-6fc147fb655d/ijme_a_792824_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 1. Heath state costs and utility values by EDSS score.
Table 2. Cost-effectiveness of sc IFN beta-1a tiw vs no treatment.
Figure 3. One-way sensitivity analysis tornado diagram. Note, this figure illustrates the variation from the base-case net monetary benefit (535,118 SEK) found when individual model parameters were changed. Values in parentheses represent the lower, base-case, and upper values tested in the sensitivity analysis. EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; HR, hazard ratio; IFN, interferon; sc, subcutaneously; SPMS, secondary progressive MS; tiw, 3-times weekly. For ‘McDonald progression approach’, 1 = constant probability of conversion to MS, 2 = parametric extrapolation used in base case. For ‘Utility dataset in use’, 1 = UK dataset26, 2 = Swedish dataset used in base case4.
![Figure 3. One-way sensitivity analysis tornado diagram. Note, this figure illustrates the variation from the base-case net monetary benefit (535,118 SEK) found when individual model parameters were changed. Values in parentheses represent the lower, base-case, and upper values tested in the sensitivity analysis. EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; HR, hazard ratio; IFN, interferon; sc, subcutaneously; SPMS, secondary progressive MS; tiw, 3-times weekly. For ‘McDonald progression approach’, 1 = constant probability of conversion to MS, 2 = parametric extrapolation used in base case. For ‘Utility dataset in use’, 1 = UK dataset26, 2 = Swedish dataset used in base case4.](/cms/asset/131829a1-4c7f-4c76-8b60-3b9ea187e236/ijme_a_792824_f0003_b.jpg)