548
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A cost-effectiveness analysis of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a 44mcg 3-times a week vs no treatment for patients with clinically isolated syndrome in Sweden

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 756-762 | Accepted 29 Mar 2013, Published online: 17 Apr 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Model schematic. CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; Tx, treatment; EDSS, expanded disability status scale; MS, multiple sclerosis.

Figure 1. Model schematic. CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; Tx, treatment; EDSS, expanded disability status scale; MS, multiple sclerosis.

Table 1. Heath state costs and utility values by EDSS score.

Figure 2. Estimated time to MS conversion: treatment vs no treatment.

Figure 2. Estimated time to MS conversion: treatment vs no treatment.

Table 2. Cost-effectiveness of sc IFN beta-1a tiw vs no treatment.

Figure 3. One-way sensitivity analysis tornado diagram. Note, this figure illustrates the variation from the base-case net monetary benefit (535,118 SEK) found when individual model parameters were changed. Values in parentheses represent the lower, base-case, and upper values tested in the sensitivity analysis. EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; HR, hazard ratio; IFN, interferon; sc, subcutaneously; SPMS, secondary progressive MS; tiw, 3-times weekly. For ‘McDonald progression approach’, 1 = constant probability of conversion to MS, 2 = parametric extrapolation used in base case. For ‘Utility dataset in use’, 1 = UK dataset26, 2 = Swedish dataset used in base case4.

Figure 3. One-way sensitivity analysis tornado diagram. Note, this figure illustrates the variation from the base-case net monetary benefit (535,118 SEK) found when individual model parameters were changed. Values in parentheses represent the lower, base-case, and upper values tested in the sensitivity analysis. EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; HR, hazard ratio; IFN, interferon; sc, subcutaneously; SPMS, secondary progressive MS; tiw, 3-times weekly. For ‘McDonald progression approach’, 1 = constant probability of conversion to MS, 2 = parametric extrapolation used in base case. For ‘Utility dataset in use’, 1 = UK dataset26, 2 = Swedish dataset used in base case4.

Figure 4. Cost-effectiveness plane showing incremental cost vs incremental QALYs for each PSA iteration.

Figure 4. Cost-effectiveness plane showing incremental cost vs incremental QALYs for each PSA iteration.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.