1,118
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

Visual Range Trends in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China, 1981–2005

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 843-849 | Published online: 10 Oct 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1. Locations of (a) the YRDR and (b) its 20 sites. Area in the small box of panel a is the YRDR.

Figure 1. Locations of (a) the YRDR and (b) its 20 sites. Area in the small box of panel a is the YRDR.

Table 1. The worst 20% and 50% and best 20% 25-yr average VR and their rates in the YRDR

Figure 2. The worst 20% and 50% and best 20% domain-average VR trends of the YRDR. Dashed lines are the linear regression curves of the corresponding trend lines.

Figure 2. The worst 20% and 50% and best 20% domain-average VR trends of the YRDR. Dashed lines are the linear regression curves of the corresponding trend lines.

Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the 5-yr average median (i.e., 50%) VR (in km): (a) the first 5 yr (i.e., from 1981 to 1985) and (b) the last 5 yr (i.e., from 2001 to 2005). The interpolation error created by sparse sites in southwestern Liyang and the coastal and southeastern regions of Longquan should be considered in analysis.

Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the 5-yr average median (i.e., 50%) VR (in km): (a) the first 5 yr (i.e., from 1981 to 1985) and (b) the last 5 yr (i.e., from 2001 to 2005). The interpolation error created by sparse sites in southwestern Liyang and the coastal and southeastern regions of Longquan should be considered in analysis.

Figure 4. Ridit plot for Nanjing, Hangzhou, and Lvsi. A mean ridit value of 0.5 means there is no difference with respect to the reference distribution, whereas a ridit value <0.5 means lower VR and >0.5 means better VR.

Figure 4. Ridit plot for Nanjing, Hangzhou, and Lvsi. A mean ridit value of 0.5 means there is no difference with respect to the reference distribution, whereas a ridit value <0.5 means lower VR and >0.5 means better VR.

Figure 5. Five-year averaged VR of the (a) worst 20%, (b) 50% (median), and (c) best 20% at Nanjing, Hangzhou, and Lvsi.

Figure 5. Five-year averaged VR of the (a) worst 20%, (b) 50% (median), and (c) best 20% at Nanjing, Hangzhou, and Lvsi.

Figure 6. Total industrial output values of Jiangsu, Shanghai, and Zhejiang and energy consumption values in industrial enterprises of Jiangsu.

Figure 6. Total industrial output values of Jiangsu, Shanghai, and Zhejiang and energy consumption values in industrial enterprises of Jiangsu.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.