2,706
Views
93
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
State of the Art

Emergent processes in cognitive-emotional interactions

Procesos emergentes en las interacciones cognitivo-emocionales

Interactions cognitivo-émotionnelles: les processus émergents

Pages 433-448 | Published online: 01 Apr 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Hypothalamic ascending connectivity. Summary of the four major pathways from the hypothalamus to the cerebral cortex schematized on a flattened representation of the rat brain The basal ganglia here refer to the magnocellular basal forebrain and the amygdala complex. Note that one of the indirect connections first “descends” to the brain stem. BG, basal ganglia; BS, brain stem; CTX, cortex; HY, hypothalamus; TH, thalamus. Adapted from ref 1: Risold PY, Thompson RH, Swanson LW. The structural organization of connections between hypothalamus and cerebra cortex. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997;24:197-254. Copyright © Elsevier, 1997
Figure 1. Hypothalamic ascending connectivity. Summary of the four major pathways from the hypothalamus to the cerebral cortex schematized on a flattened representation of the rat brain The basal ganglia here refer to the magnocellular basal forebrain and the amygdala complex. Note that one of the indirect connections first “descends” to the brain stem. BG, basal ganglia; BS, brain stem; CTX, cortex; HY, hypothalamus; TH, thalamus. Adapted from ref 1: Risold PY, Thompson RH, Swanson LW. The structural organization of connections between hypothalamus and cerebra cortex. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1997;24:197-254. Copyright © Elsevier, 1997
Figure 2. Cognitive-emotional interactions. Affective value interacts with both perceptual and executive processes.
Figure 2. Cognitive-emotional interactions. Affective value interacts with both perceptual and executive processes.
Figure 3. Interactions between emotion and perception. (A) Visual processing is suggested to be modulated by affective value via several mechanisms, including those involving projections from the amygdala, basal forebrain, orbitofrontal cortex, and possibly hypothalamus (not shown). (B) Another class of modulatory mechanisms relies on interactions between “evaluative” sites (shown in color) and “control” sites (shown in white), the latter located in frontoparietal cortex and known to exert top-down influences on visual processing. Dotted ines indicate possibly indirect connections. All locations are approximate, and the positions of the amygdala, basal forebrain, hypothalamus, and pulvinar are shown on the latera surface for schematic purposes. A, amygdala; BF, basal forebrain; FEF, frontal eye field; Hyp, hypothalamus; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; Pul, pulvinar.
Figure 3. Interactions between emotion and perception. (A) Visual processing is suggested to be modulated by affective value via several mechanisms, including those involving projections from the amygdala, basal forebrain, orbitofrontal cortex, and possibly hypothalamus (not shown). (B) Another class of modulatory mechanisms relies on interactions between “evaluative” sites (shown in color) and “control” sites (shown in white), the latter located in frontoparietal cortex and known to exert top-down influences on visual processing. Dotted ines indicate possibly indirect connections. All locations are approximate, and the positions of the amygdala, basal forebrain, hypothalamus, and pulvinar are shown on the latera surface for schematic purposes. A, amygdala; BF, basal forebrain; FEF, frontal eye field; Hyp, hypothalamus; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; Pul, pulvinar.
Figure 4. Executive competition and threat. Executive functions can be viewed as relying on multiple mechanisms, also referred to as resources (R1 through R4; eg, “shifting,” “updating”), that are partly independent but, critically, are also shared (indicated by the orange circle). When threat content is high, these shared resources (SR) are engaged, thus detracting from the ability to recruit specific mechanisms at optimal levels Consequently, behavioral performance relying on those mechanisms will be impaired
Figure 4. Executive competition and threat. Executive functions can be viewed as relying on multiple mechanisms, also referred to as resources (R1 through R4; eg, “shifting,” “updating”), that are partly independent but, critically, are also shared (indicated by the orange circle). When threat content is high, these shared resources (SR) are engaged, thus detracting from the ability to recruit specific mechanisms at optimal levels Consequently, behavioral performance relying on those mechanisms will be impaired
Figure 5. Interactions between emotion and cognition. The anterior nsula and the anterior cingulate cortex are important sites nvolved in determining affective significance and value. In so doing, they are closely affiliated with an extended set of regions, some of which are shown here in the orange ellipse The anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex interact closely with the lateral prefrontal cortex, a region involved in several cognitive functions. In this manner, cognitive-emotional interactions occur during complex behaviors. Notably, these interactions can be either beneficial or detrimental to behavior. In the latter case, for instance, when threat level is high, resources required for cognitive operations are partly consumed, thereby compromising behavioral performance ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; Amyg, amygdala; Ant insula, anterior insula; BF, basal forebrain; Hyp, hypothalamus; LPFC, lateral prefrontal cortex
Figure 5. Interactions between emotion and cognition. The anterior nsula and the anterior cingulate cortex are important sites nvolved in determining affective significance and value. In so doing, they are closely affiliated with an extended set of regions, some of which are shown here in the orange ellipse The anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex interact closely with the lateral prefrontal cortex, a region involved in several cognitive functions. In this manner, cognitive-emotional interactions occur during complex behaviors. Notably, these interactions can be either beneficial or detrimental to behavior. In the latter case, for instance, when threat level is high, resources required for cognitive operations are partly consumed, thereby compromising behavioral performance ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; Amyg, amygdala; Ant insula, anterior insula; BF, basal forebrain; Hyp, hypothalamus; LPFC, lateral prefrontal cortex