3,056
Views
52
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Research Articles

Latent profile analysis and principal axis factoring of the DSM-5 dissociative subtype

, , &
Article: 26406 | Received 23 Oct 2014, Accepted 05 Mar 2015, Published online: 01 Apr 2015

Figures & data

Table 1 Principal axis factor analysis with direct oblimin rotation of the 20-item PCL-5 plus depersonalization and derealization items

Table 2 Six factor correlation matrix identified in principal axis factor analysis of the 20-item PCL-5 plus depersonalization and derealization items

Table 3 Fit indices for different latent class solutions (PCL-5 ≥38)

Fig. 1 PTSD and dissociation symptom severity across five latent classes. EN-M=Emotional Numbing—Moderate. HYP-M=Hyperarousal—Moderate. DISS-M=Dissociation—Moderate. DISS-S=Dissociation—Severe. ND-S=Non-Dissociative—Severe. LC=Latent Class. Statistically significant between class differences are reported in .

Fig. 1 PTSD and dissociation symptom severity across five latent classes. EN-M=Emotional Numbing—Moderate. HYP-M=Hyperarousal—Moderate. DISS-M=Dissociation—Moderate. DISS-S=Dissociation—Severe. ND-S=Non-Dissociative—Severe. LC=Latent Class. Statistically significant between class differences are reported in Table 4.

Table 4 Differences between latent classes in PTSD and depersonalization and derealization symptom frequency

Table 5 Differences between latent classes on latent factors identified by principal axis factor analysis

Table 6 Differences between latent classes in other measures of dissociative experience

Table 7 Differences between latent classes in measures of presumed non-dissociative distress

Table 8 Differences between latent classes in measures of childhood trauma history

Supplemental material

Turkish abstract

Download PDF (85.2 KB)

Spanish abstract

Download PDF (72.1 KB)

Russian abstract

Download PDF (70.9 KB)