Figures & data
Fig. 1 Incidence (×100,000 population) of Q fever laboratory tests (n =11,035) with locations of all small ruminant farms with ≥50 animals in the south of the Netherlands by four-digit postal code area. Data from patients testing positive in 2009 and 2010, and patients testing negative in 2010 at the laboratories in 's-Hertogenbosch (H) and Veldhoven (V).
![Fig. 1 Incidence (×100,000 population) of Q fever laboratory tests (n =11,035) with locations of all small ruminant farms with ≥50 animals in the south of the Netherlands by four-digit postal code area. Data from patients testing positive in 2009 and 2010, and patients testing negative in 2010 at the laboratories in 's-Hertogenbosch (H) and Veldhoven (V).](/cms/asset/50cbab66-1bc0-4d81-8143-c8e51aa67f28/ziee_a_11815251_f0001_ob.jpg)
Fig. 2 Proportion of positive test results based on the same data as in with locations of infected goat farms.
![Fig. 2 Proportion of positive test results based on the same data as in Fig. 1 with locations of infected goat farms.](/cms/asset/423c0c8d-2884-48dd-a7b8-bc1fc5639e3f/ziee_a_11815251_f0002_ob.jpg)
Table 1 Characteristics of individuals with a positive or negative laboratory test result
Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with testing positive for Q fever