373
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research/review articles

The intraseasonal variability of winter semester surface air temperature in Antarctica

, , , , , , , & show all
Article: 6039 | Published online: 22 Feb 2011

Figures & data

Fig. 1.  of the Antarctic continent and Southern Ocean.

Table 1. Correlation coefficients of the time series of 2-m air temperature (April–September) during different periods for daily Reanalysis 2 data and observations from the US National Centers for Environmental Prediction.

Fig. 2.  Spatial distributions of the leading four empirical orthogonal function modes of 2-m air temperature: (a) first mode, (b) second mode, (c) third mode and (d) fourth mode.

Fig. 3.  Spatial distributions of the first empirical orthogonal function mode of band-pass filtered surface pressure.

Fig. 4.  Spatial distribution of the first mode for (a) upward net longwave radiation flux and (b) 150-hPa zonal wind.

Fig. 5.  Spatial distributions of the leading four empirical orthogonal function modes for 20–90-day band-pass filtered 200-hPa streamfunction: (a) first mode, (b) second mode, (c) third mode and (d) fourth mode.

Fig. 6.  Correlations as a function of lead and lag time between time coefficients of mode 1 and mode 2 (dotted line with square markers) and between time coefficients of mode 3 and mode 4 (solid line with diamond markers).

Fig. 7.  The 200-hPa 20–90-day band-pass filtered eddy streamfunction anomaly composite averaged over all (a) negative mode 1, (b) negative mode 2, (c) positive mode 1 and (d) positive mode 2. Contour interval is 1×106 m2 s−1. Regions with values that are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level are shaded.

Fig. 8.  The 20–90-day band-pass filtered outgoing longwave radiation anomaly composite averaged over all (a) negative mode 1, (b) negative mode 2, (c) positive mode 1 and (d) positive mode 2. Contour interval is 1 W m−2. Regions with values that are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level are shaded.

Fig. 9.  The 20–90-day band-pass filtered velocity potential anomaly composite averaged over all (a) negative mode 1, (b) negative mode 2, (c) positive mode 1 and (d) positive mode 2. Contour interval is 2×105 m2 s−1. Regions with values that are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level are shaded.

Fig. 10.  The 500-hpa 20–90-day band-pass filtered geopotential height anomaly composite averaged over all (a) negative mode 1, (b) negative mode 2, (c) positive mode 1 and (d) positive mode 2. Contour interval is 10 gpm. Regions with values that are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level are shaded.

Fig. 11.  500-hpa 20–90-day band-pass filtered 10-m wind field anomaly composite averaged over all (a) negative mode 1, (b) negative mode 2, (c) positive mode 1 and (d) positive mode 2. Regions with values that are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level are shaded.

Fig. 12.  The 500-hpa 20–90-day band-pass filtered 2-m air temperature anomaly composite averaged over all (a) negative mode 1, (b) negative mode 2, (c) positive mode 1 and (d) positive mode 2. Contour interval is 0.5 °C. Regions with values that are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level are shaded.

Fig. 13.  Spatial distributions of the leading four empirical orthogonal function modes for 10–20-day band-pass filtered 200-hPa streamfunction with the zonal mean removed.