Figures & data
Fig. 1 Scatterplots and regression lines for the Antarctic data from 1 January 2009 to 29 April 2009: (a) data from the Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) 19-GHz horizontal channel and (b) data from the SSM/I 37-GHz vertically polarized channel.
![Fig. 1 Scatterplots and regression lines for the Antarctic data from 1 January 2009 to 29 April 2009: (a) data from the Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) 19-GHz horizontal channel and (b) data from the SSM/I 37-GHz vertically polarized channel.](/cms/asset/055d8717-d3e7-4a76-8c2c-fdea793c9d89/zpor_a_11818795_f0001_ob.jpg)
Table 1 Regression coefficients for data adjustments between different sensors in Antarctica.
Fig. 2 Cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) values at the Wilkins Ice Shelf area (from 1978 to 2010).
![Fig. 2 Cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) values at the Wilkins Ice Shelf area (from 1978 to 2010).](/cms/asset/304d2b8e-97fa-45d0-9d6a-76e9bdbbc2bf/zpor_a_11818795_f0002_ob.jpg)
Fig. 3 Cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) histogram and optimal threshold at the Wilkins Ice Shelf area (from 1978 to 2010). The red asterisk is the unsupervised XPGR threshold (−0.0293) obtained by the melt signal adaptation method.
![Fig. 3 Cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) histogram and optimal threshold at the Wilkins Ice Shelf area (from 1978 to 2010). The red asterisk is the unsupervised XPGR threshold (−0.0293) obtained by the melt signal adaptation method.](/cms/asset/b168bea7-ed0f-4273-8cef-5ea858558bb5/zpor_a_11818795_f0003_ob.jpg)
Fig. 4 Segmentation line of the optimal threshold at the Wilkins Ice Shelf area (from 1978 to 2010). The red line is the unsupervised Cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) threshold (−0.0293) obtained by the melt signal adaptation method.
![Fig. 4 Segmentation line of the optimal threshold at the Wilkins Ice Shelf area (from 1978 to 2010). The red line is the unsupervised Cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) threshold (−0.0293) obtained by the melt signal adaptation method.](/cms/asset/86a2781a-b932-4f34-a362-8ff303191144/zpor_a_11818795_f0004_ob.jpg)
Fig. 5 Flowchart of modified cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) detection method. Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer is abbreviated to SMMR and Special Sensor Microwave/Imager to SSM/I.
![Fig. 5 Flowchart of modified cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) detection method. Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer is abbreviated to SMMR and Special Sensor Microwave/Imager to SSM/I.](/cms/asset/08ab24b0-0924-406f-9e11-59dba209135c/zpor_a_11818795_f0005_ob.jpg)
Fig. 6 Two optimal thresholds obtained from a bimodal Gaussian distribution model (BG) and a generalized Gaussian model (GG).
![Fig. 6 Two optimal thresholds obtained from a bimodal Gaussian distribution model (BG) and a generalized Gaussian model (GG).](/cms/asset/95831f68-e596-4e0f-afd1-d92eb8262379/zpor_a_11818795_f0006_ob.jpg)
Fig. 7 Flowchart of the modified ice-sheet snowmelt detection method based on wavelet transformation. Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer is abbreviated to SMMR and Special Sensor Microwave/Imager to SSM/I.
![Fig. 7 Flowchart of the modified ice-sheet snowmelt detection method based on wavelet transformation. Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer is abbreviated to SMMR and Special Sensor Microwave/Imager to SSM/I.](/cms/asset/c0fdf873-d10b-4c68-9887-c8592b5125e0/zpor_a_11818795_f0007_ob.jpg)
Fig. 8 The threshold determination based on cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) value in the Greenland study area. The solid blue line represents the XPGR values from 1988 to 1995, the red line is the XPGR threshold (−0.0158) obtained by Abdalati & Steffen's (Citation1997) method, and the light blue line is the unsupervised XPGR threshold (−0.0152).
![Fig. 8 The threshold determination based on cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) value in the Greenland study area. The solid blue line represents the XPGR values from 1988 to 1995, the red line is the XPGR threshold (−0.0158) obtained by Abdalati & Steffen's (Citation1997) method, and the light blue line is the unsupervised XPGR threshold (−0.0152).](/cms/asset/85a1b359-a17d-4334-9230-5e5e8684a7de/zpor_a_11818795_f0008_ob.jpg)
Fig. 9 Ice-sheet snowmelt distribution of the modified cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) detection method and the XPGR method on 2 August 1996: (a) the result of the XPGR method; (b) the result of the modified XPGR method.
![Fig. 9 Ice-sheet snowmelt distribution of the modified cross-gradient polarization ratio (XPGR) detection method and the XPGR method on 2 August 1996: (a) the result of the XPGR method; (b) the result of the modified XPGR method.](/cms/asset/c279ef43-6f5e-431b-b4de-8502a8b94412/zpor_a_11818795_f0009_ob.jpg)
Fig. 10 Ice-sheet snowmelt distribution during 2007–08 derived from the two optimal thresholds: (a) the bimodal Gaussian distribution model optimal threshold; (b) the generalized Gaussian model automatic threshold.
![Fig. 10 Ice-sheet snowmelt distribution during 2007–08 derived from the two optimal thresholds: (a) the bimodal Gaussian distribution model optimal threshold; (b) the generalized Gaussian model automatic threshold.](/cms/asset/6872192d-9d74-46a2-b099-f58620633e7c/zpor_a_11818795_f0010_ob.jpg)
Fig. 11 Ice-sheet snowmelt detection results obtained from the modified wavelet transformation method in Antarctica, 2007–08: (a) melt onset; (b) melt end; (c) melt duration.
![Fig. 11 Ice-sheet snowmelt detection results obtained from the modified wavelet transformation method in Antarctica, 2007–08: (a) melt onset; (b) melt end; (c) melt duration.](/cms/asset/b96c1174-9bdb-4914-ac61-d181ef8fb9c4/zpor_a_11818795_f0011_ob.jpg)
Table 2 Automatic weather stations.
Table 3 Quantitative snowmelt detection results (in %), applying two methods in four areas.