Figures & data
Fig. 1 Location of Cape Krusenstern National Monument. The study area lies just north of the Arctic Circle, and within the continuous permafrost zone (permafrost boundary after Jorgenson et al. Citation2008).
![Fig. 1 Location of Cape Krusenstern National Monument. The study area lies just north of the Arctic Circle, and within the continuous permafrost zone (permafrost boundary after Jorgenson et al. Citation2008).](/cms/asset/82d94097-cd93-4a67-a6fc-3342cc988046/zpor_a_11818808_f0001_ob.jpg)
Fig. 3 Looking north towards a house pit in Giddings’ winter settlement. (Photo by Christopher Wolff.)
![Fig. 3 Looking north towards a house pit in Giddings’ winter settlement. (Photo by Christopher Wolff.)](/cms/asset/ce613613-4143-4d3b-9a74-a66bdd7e9b94/zpor_a_11818808_f0003_ob.jpg)
Fig. 4 The site presented a flat surface free of obstructions, making the deployment of geophysical instruments very easy. Shown here, Thomas Urban with Noggin ground-penetrating radar system. (Photo by Christopher Wolff.)
![Fig. 4 The site presented a flat surface free of obstructions, making the deployment of geophysical instruments very easy. Shown here, Thomas Urban with Noggin ground-penetrating radar system. (Photo by Christopher Wolff.)](/cms/asset/5e5c299c-721c-4fff-a426-0e1d80a6ec48/zpor_a_11818808_f0004_ob.jpg)
Fig. 5 Amplitude-slice image of ground-penetrating radar results revealing complex dendritic patchwork related to a combination of hydrologic and cryogenic processes in the active layer (i.e., above the permafrost layer).
![Fig. 5 Amplitude-slice image of ground-penetrating radar results revealing complex dendritic patchwork related to a combination of hydrologic and cryogenic processes in the active layer (i.e., above the permafrost layer).](/cms/asset/4937558d-2402-4744-ab73-58bac1088217/zpor_a_11818808_f0005_ob.jpg)
Fig. 6 Test excavation of the edge of sunken surface feature revealing fine sandy deposits (under north arrow) that naturally infilled a permafrost fissure.
![Fig. 6 Test excavation of the edge of sunken surface feature revealing fine sandy deposits (under north arrow) that naturally infilled a permafrost fissure.](/cms/asset/f419674c-afc0-45e5-bbd5-e8473cbd0591/zpor_a_11818808_f0006_ob.jpg)
Fig. 7 In this comparison of magnetic and ground-penetrating radar results, the ground-penetrating radar image (lower) has undergone a spherical averaging filter to reduce clutter and emphasize strong trends. This is a true three-dimensional rendering with the upper 50 cm removed to reveal underlying features. The magnetic image (upper) incorporates a grey-scale rendering of the upward continued pseudo-gradient with a colour-contour map. The contour map uses the full range of magnetic data to indicate the locations of metal (contour interval = 3 nT/m) and demonstrate that features of interest are represented in only a very narrow range of the data.
![Fig. 7 In this comparison of magnetic and ground-penetrating radar results, the ground-penetrating radar image (lower) has undergone a spherical averaging filter to reduce clutter and emphasize strong trends. This is a true three-dimensional rendering with the upper 50 cm removed to reveal underlying features. The magnetic image (upper) incorporates a grey-scale rendering of the upward continued pseudo-gradient with a colour-contour map. The contour map uses the full range of magnetic data to indicate the locations of metal (contour interval = 3 nT/m) and demonstrate that features of interest are represented in only a very narrow range of the data.](/cms/asset/a026530f-7e5a-4290-857e-c67d9dddc31a/zpor_a_11818808_f0007_ob.jpg)
Fig. 8 Overlays of magnetic and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) results along entire survey area indicated a deeper trend from the underlying beach ridge.
![Fig. 8 Overlays of magnetic and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) results along entire survey area indicated a deeper trend from the underlying beach ridge.](/cms/asset/cce36e1e-2730-442f-9672-094ee0cc354a/zpor_a_11818808_f0008_ob.jpg)
Fig. 9 The magnetic survey of the summer settlement revealed strong signals from the known houses and from various ferrous debris. The additional house documented by Darwent & Darwent (Citation2005) was not evident.
![Fig. 9 The magnetic survey of the summer settlement revealed strong signals from the known houses and from various ferrous debris. The additional house documented by Darwent & Darwent (Citation2005) was not evident.](/cms/asset/ca77ce0a-6d2b-4681-8069-aa775d53bd38/zpor_a_11818808_f0009_ob.jpg)