647
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

Expression profiles of cohesins, shugoshins and spindle assembly checkpoint genes in rhesus macaque oocytes predict their susceptibility for aneuploidy during embryonic development

Pages 740-748 | Received 31 Aug 2011, Accepted 29 Dec 2011, Published online: 15 Feb 2012

Figures & data

Figure 1 Scatterplots of normalized gene expression levels for each transcript in individual oocytes mature at retrieval (group 1) or maturing post-retrieval (group 2). Bars represent the median level.

Figure 1 Scatterplots of normalized gene expression levels for each transcript in individual oocytes mature at retrieval (group 1) or maturing post-retrieval (group 2). Bars represent the median level.

Figure 2 Incidence of relative gene expression levels in individual rhesus macaque oocytes mature at retrieval (group 1; dark gray bars) or maturing post-retrieval (group 2; light gray bars). (A) Quantity of oocytes lacking each specific transcript; (B) Quantity of oocytes with specific transcript expression levels below the median; (C) Quantity of oocytes with specific transcript expression levels above the median.*represents a statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (α = 0.05).

Figure 2 Incidence of relative gene expression levels in individual rhesus macaque oocytes mature at retrieval (group 1; dark gray bars) or maturing post-retrieval (group 2; light gray bars). (A) Quantity of oocytes lacking each specific transcript; (B) Quantity of oocytes with specific transcript expression levels below the median; (C) Quantity of oocytes with specific transcript expression levels above the median.*represents a statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (α = 0.05).

Figure 3 Correlation curves for BUB1 compared with minimal expression of shugoshins or mitotic cohesins (STAG1, SMC1A, SMC3, RAD21, SGOL1 and SGOL2). (A) significant positive correlation (rho = 0.60, p < 0.01) within group 1 oocytes. (B) Absence of a significant correlation (rho = -0.20, p = 0.43) in group 2 oocytes.

Figure 3 Correlation curves for BUB1 compared with minimal expression of shugoshins or mitotic cohesins (STAG1, SMC1A, SMC3, RAD21, SGOL1 and SGOL2). (A) significant positive correlation (rho = 0.60, p < 0.01) within group 1 oocytes. (B) Absence of a significant correlation (rho = -0.20, p = 0.43) in group 2 oocytes.

Table 1 Selected proteins associated with chromosome segregation

Table 2 Significant Correlation Coefficients between transcript expression levels in group 1 and group 2 oocytes

Table 3 Sequences of real-time PCR primers, TaqMan probe and product size

Supplemental material

Additional material

Download Zip (43.7 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.