Figures & data
Table 1. Optimized conditions for Drosophila LV-SEM using the FEI Quanta 450
Figure 1. Effects of spot size, working distance, and pressure on LV-SEM images. Bar = 10 µm for each set of images. The contrast was adjusted post-collection in this and the remaining figures, except where noted (see Materials and Methods). (A–E) Effect of spot size on the w1118 eye; the same region is shown in each panel; shot at 1000× magnification. Spot sizes were 2.0 (A); 2.5 (B); 3.0 (C); 3.5 (D); and 4.5 (E) as indicated. Resolution is slightly better at lower spot sizes, but the signal is lower and noise more apparent. Spot = 3.5 balances good resolution with low noise and sample damage. (F-H) Thoracic bristles of w1118 were scanned at 2000× and 15 kV, with spot sizes 2.5 (F), 3.5 (G), and 5.0 (H) as indicated. The same region is shown in each panel. Using spot = 5.0 leads to singed hairs (arrowhead) and charging on the bristle sockets, problems not observed with spot = 3.5. (I–J) Increased working distance (WD) provides increased depth of field. Focus is set on the upper surface of a w1118 haltere in both panels, taken at 500×. Note the underlying thorax has better focus in (J) (WD = 14.8 mm) than in (I) (WD = 5.0 mm). (K–M) Variation in chamber pressure, using orbital bristles taken at 2500× and shown with original contrast. The same bristle socket is shown at 0.30 (K), 0.53 (L), and 0.68 Torr (M).
![Figure 1. Effects of spot size, working distance, and pressure on LV-SEM images. Bar = 10 µm for each set of images. The contrast was adjusted post-collection in this and the remaining figures, except where noted (see Materials and Methods). (A–E) Effect of spot size on the w1118 eye; the same region is shown in each panel; shot at 1000× magnification. Spot sizes were 2.0 (A); 2.5 (B); 3.0 (C); 3.5 (D); and 4.5 (E) as indicated. Resolution is slightly better at lower spot sizes, but the signal is lower and noise more apparent. Spot = 3.5 balances good resolution with low noise and sample damage. (F-H) Thoracic bristles of w1118 were scanned at 2000× and 15 kV, with spot sizes 2.5 (F), 3.5 (G), and 5.0 (H) as indicated. The same region is shown in each panel. Using spot = 5.0 leads to singed hairs (arrowhead) and charging on the bristle sockets, problems not observed with spot = 3.5. (I–J) Increased working distance (WD) provides increased depth of field. Focus is set on the upper surface of a w1118 haltere in both panels, taken at 500×. Note the underlying thorax has better focus in (J) (WD = 14.8 mm) than in (I) (WD = 5.0 mm). (K–M) Variation in chamber pressure, using orbital bristles taken at 2500× and shown with original contrast. The same bristle socket is shown at 0.30 (K), 0.53 (L), and 0.68 Torr (M).](/cms/asset/f617b1dc-e0e3-4a2a-8a21-ccb58bd7c844/kfly_a_10920525_f0001.gif)
Figure 2. Effect of accelerating voltage on the w1118 eye and the sex comb of the male foreleg. All panels were shot at 1000×; bar = 10 µm for all. A-D, w1118 eye; the same region is shown in each panel. Voltages were 10 (A); 15 (B); 20 (C); and 25 kV (D). Appearance of ommatidia changes substantially as voltage varies; the 15 kV image most resembles a conventional high-vacuum SEM image. (E–F) the striations of the sex comb bristles are clearly seen at 7.5 kV (E), but not at 15 kV (F).
![Figure 2. Effect of accelerating voltage on the w1118 eye and the sex comb of the male foreleg. All panels were shot at 1000×; bar = 10 µm for all. A-D, w1118 eye; the same region is shown in each panel. Voltages were 10 (A); 15 (B); 20 (C); and 25 kV (D). Appearance of ommatidia changes substantially as voltage varies; the 15 kV image most resembles a conventional high-vacuum SEM image. (E–F) the striations of the sex comb bristles are clearly seen at 7.5 kV (E), but not at 15 kV (F).](/cms/asset/67cb2f41-b455-4d19-9a94-a3cb9fdc453b/kfly_a_10920525_f0002.gif)
Figure 3. Examples of wild type structures at varying magnifications in w1118 flies. (B, D and E) were scanned in large format (2048 pixel width). Beam = 15 kV for (A, B, E and F). (A) Whole female mounted in CCC; bar = 1 mm; shot at 20×. (B) Male genitalia (ventral); bar = 50 µm; shot at 250×. (C) Male wing margin (distal is up); bar = 10 µm; shot at 500× and 7.5 kV. (D) Male tarsal claw and pulvillus; bar = 10 µm; shot at 2000× and 10 kV. (E) Sensory hair bed on the ventral anterior side of the thorax near the head (male; anterior is up). Bar = 10 µm; shot at 1500×. (F) Proboscis; bar = 50 µm; shot at 340× and spot = 3.0.
![Figure 3. Examples of wild type structures at varying magnifications in w1118 flies. (B, D and E) were scanned in large format (2048 pixel width). Beam = 15 kV for (A, B, E and F). (A) Whole female mounted in CCC; bar = 1 mm; shot at 20×. (B) Male genitalia (ventral); bar = 50 µm; shot at 250×. (C) Male wing margin (distal is up); bar = 10 µm; shot at 500× and 7.5 kV. (D) Male tarsal claw and pulvillus; bar = 10 µm; shot at 2000× and 10 kV. (E) Sensory hair bed on the ventral anterior side of the thorax near the head (male; anterior is up). Bar = 10 µm; shot at 1500×. (F) Proboscis; bar = 50 µm; shot at 340× and spot = 3.0.](/cms/asset/71c0e64c-f472-43b3-b079-11a59a48cece/kfly_a_10920525_f0003.gif)
Figure 4. Analysis of mutant phenotypes using LV-SEM. Bars = 10 µm for each pair of images. (A–B) orbital bristles from dorsal head of w1118 (A) and sn (B) males shot at 750×, 10 kV. (C–D) retina of w1118 (C) and GMR-GAL4 > Mi[Hto-WP]QYE (D), shot at 1000× and 2048 pixel width. (E–F) Equivalent regions of w1118 (E) and ms1096w-GAL4 > Mi[Hto-WP]VRC male wings (F), shot at 1500×, 7.5 kV. Note multipronged wing hairs in (F). (G–H) Wing surface with L3 vein and campaniform sense organ (center), from w1118 (G) and ms1096w-GAL4 > Mi[Hto-WP]NAW (H), shot at 1000×, 7.5 kV. In (H), note the hairs are eliminated from this region of the wing, and the cuticle is abnormal.
![Figure 4. Analysis of mutant phenotypes using LV-SEM. Bars = 10 µm for each pair of images. (A–B) orbital bristles from dorsal head of w1118 (A) and sn (B) males shot at 750×, 10 kV. (C–D) retina of w1118 (C) and GMR-GAL4 > Mi[Hto-WP]QYE (D), shot at 1000× and 2048 pixel width. (E–F) Equivalent regions of w1118 (E) and ms1096w-GAL4 > Mi[Hto-WP]VRC male wings (F), shot at 1500×, 7.5 kV. Note multipronged wing hairs in (F). (G–H) Wing surface with L3 vein and campaniform sense organ (center), from w1118 (G) and ms1096w-GAL4 > Mi[Hto-WP]NAW (H), shot at 1000×, 7.5 kV. In (H), note the hairs are eliminated from this region of the wing, and the cuticle is abnormal.](/cms/asset/bf63d76c-2ca5-4137-9062-ce0d349f4672/kfly_a_10920525_f0004.gif)