Figures & data
Figure 1. High throughput compound screening protocol for E. histolytica and G. lamblia trophozoites in 96-well microtiter plate.
![Figure 1. High throughput compound screening protocol for E. histolytica and G. lamblia trophozoites in 96-well microtiter plate.](/cms/asset/f5df8b22-1292-4084-9404-13e332b83159/kgmi_a_10922596_f0001.gif)
Figure 2. In vitro efficacy of different concentrations of aurnofin on the growth of C. parvum, as determined by real-time PCR. Bars represent standard errors of the means derived from three replicates.
![Figure 2. In vitro efficacy of different concentrations of aurnofin on the growth of C. parvum, as determined by real-time PCR. Bars represent standard errors of the means derived from three replicates.](/cms/asset/3015d685-6f71-4f79-859b-19f4e87a7056/kgmi_a_10922596_f0002.gif)
Figure 3. Clustered display of data from a portion of E. histolytica microarray, indicating downregulated (A) and upregulated transcripts (B) due to auranofin treatment. Microarray hybridizations (A and B) were performed using RNA from DMSO-treated E. histolytica and 1 µM auranofin-treated E. histolytica. Data from related genes in two separate hybridizations (Eh34 and Eh35) were analyzed by use of Acuity software.Citation22
![Figure 3. Clustered display of data from a portion of E. histolytica microarray, indicating downregulated (A) and upregulated transcripts (B) due to auranofin treatment. Microarray hybridizations (A and B) were performed using RNA from DMSO-treated E. histolytica and 1 µM auranofin-treated E. histolytica. Data from related genes in two separate hybridizations (Eh34 and Eh35) were analyzed by use of Acuity software.Citation22](/cms/asset/41d2636a-c905-41b1-a8c7-3d670c1c652e/kgmi_a_10922596_f0003.gif)