Figures & data
Figure 1. Illustration of the effect of rating curve evolution for Carbon Creek near the mouth (07EF004). The dotted line shows rating curve 2 and the dashed line shows rating curve 3. The solid dots indicate the measurements used to define curve 2; the open circles indicate additional measurements available to define curve 3.
![Figure 1. Illustration of the effect of rating curve evolution for Carbon Creek near the mouth (07EF004). The dotted line shows rating curve 2 and the dashed line shows rating curve 3. The solid dots indicate the measurements used to define curve 2; the open circles indicate additional measurements available to define curve 3.](/cms/asset/e0236fbe-b528-405a-997e-b9a7f9129bfe/tcwr_a_10636612_o_f0001.gif)
Figure 2. Illustration of the effect of rating curve evolution for Carbon Creek near the mouth (07EF004). The solid line shows curve 12. The dotted line shows curve 2 and the dashed line shows curve 3. Solid dots indicate measurements used to define curve 2; open circles indicate additional measurements used to define curve 3; open triangles indicate additional measurements used for curve 12.
![Figure 2. Illustration of the effect of rating curve evolution for Carbon Creek near the mouth (07EF004). The solid line shows curve 12. The dotted line shows curve 2 and the dashed line shows curve 3. Solid dots indicate measurements used to define curve 2; open circles indicate additional measurements used to define curve 3; open triangles indicate additional measurements used for curve 12.](/cms/asset/cd31c99e-4c8b-4608-a7eb-bc76d08d9900/tcwr_a_10636612_o_f0002.gif)
Figure 4. Ekapo Creek near Marieval (05JM010) rating curve and shift curves used for the 2007 data year. The solid line indicates the base rating curve; the open circles indicate the rating measurements; the dashed lines indicate the shifts applied over the summer of 2007 (identified by mm-dd). The shifts are due to beaver activity.
![Figure 4. Ekapo Creek near Marieval (05JM010) rating curve and shift curves used for the 2007 data year. The solid line indicates the base rating curve; the open circles indicate the rating measurements; the dashed lines indicate the shifts applied over the summer of 2007 (identified by mm-dd). The shifts are due to beaver activity.](/cms/asset/6e062ed7-45a2-4a9b-a7ee-5ec50306f20e/tcwr_a_10636612_o_f0004.gif)
Figure 5. Illustration of the effect of changes in procedures for subjective estimation of winter streamflow for Takhini River near Whitehorse (09AC001).
![Figure 5. Illustration of the effect of changes in procedures for subjective estimation of winter streamflow for Takhini River near Whitehorse (09AC001).](/cms/asset/453aa007-e7e6-4197-8106-3d6250f05976/tcwr_a_10636612_o_f0005.gif)
Figure 6. Illustration of the effect of changes in procedures for subjective estimation of winter streamflow for Liard River at Upper Crossing (10AA001). Grey line indicates open-water record; black line segments show the ice-cover period.
![Figure 6. Illustration of the effect of changes in procedures for subjective estimation of winter streamflow for Liard River at Upper Crossing (10AA001). Grey line indicates open-water record; black line segments show the ice-cover period.](/cms/asset/ae458942-e558-4c2c-8699-3ddd37d4a78b/tcwr_a_10636612_o_f0006.gif)
Figure 7. Simulation of the difference between discharge based on once-per-day manual observations and recorded stage for Lillooet River near Pemberton (08MG005) for the period 1997 to 2011. Qm represents discharge based on stage observed at 09:00 and Qc represents discharge computed from continuously recorded stage. a) Monthly mean streamflow, b) daily mean streamflow. Horizontal lines indicate 5% deviation from a ratio of unity.
![Figure 7. Simulation of the difference between discharge based on once-per-day manual observations and recorded stage for Lillooet River near Pemberton (08MG005) for the period 1997 to 2011. Qm represents discharge based on stage observed at 09:00 and Qc represents discharge computed from continuously recorded stage. a) Monthly mean streamflow, b) daily mean streamflow. Horizontal lines indicate 5% deviation from a ratio of unity.](/cms/asset/54bcae2d-4e1a-4714-8ba3-fcd8a25343e9/tcwr_a_10636612_o_f0007.gif)
Figure 8. Hydraulic geometry plots for Thompson River near Spences Bridge (08LF051). The ovals in plots b) and c) indicate a region of systematic deviation between predicted and observed depth and velocity. The double headed arrows connect examples of individual measurements that have may have compensating errors.
![Figure 8. Hydraulic geometry plots for Thompson River near Spences Bridge (08LF051). The ovals in plots b) and c) indicate a region of systematic deviation between predicted and observed depth and velocity. The double headed arrows connect examples of individual measurements that have may have compensating errors.](/cms/asset/3830e8ec-5a40-44cf-bf38-f433dcf656d1/tcwr_a_10636612_o_f0008.gif)