Are economists amoral? Contemporary economic thought and the distinction between values and prices

Abstract

Underlying the “clash of cultures” between economists and the rest of the citizenry is a way of thinking about rationality, consumer choice and policy that periodically reveals a confusion between values and prices on the side of economists. Lawrence Summers' famous memo on the underpollution of the Third World was a case in point. Sadly, this was not an isolated incident. On the contrary, mainstream economists are conditioned, by the categories they employ, to regularly conflate value with price. This is particularly the case when it comes to theorizing about consumer choice and the meaning(s) to be ascribed to the set of market prices that emerge from the aggregate of these choices. This paper explores the dimensions of the problem and suggests other frameworks of choice that can enrich our understanding of consumer behavior and the significance of the set of prices that emerge in the market.