Abstract
Let and be finite simple graphs where every edge of belongs to at least one subgraph that is isomorphic to . An --antimagic total labeling of a graph is a bijection such that for all subgraphs isomorphic to , the -weights, form an arithmetic progression where are two fixed integers and is the number of subgraphs of isomorphic to . Moreover, if the vertex set receives the minimum possible labels , then is called a super --antimagic total labeling. In this paper we study super --antimagic total labeling of a disconnected graph, namely .
1 Introduction
Let and be finite, undirected and simple graphs. Let and be the vertex set of , the vertex set of , the edge set of and the edge set of , respectively. Let , , and . A graph admits an - if every edge of belongs to at least one subgraph that is isomorphic to .
Gutiérrez and Lladó [Citation1] defined an -magic labeling of a graph as a generalization of a magic valuation by Kotzig and Rosa [Citation2]. An -magic total labeling of a graph admitting an -covering is a bijection such that for all subgraphs isomorphic to , is a constant. Moreover, if has an additional property , then is called an -supermagic total labeling. A graph that admits an -(super)magic total labeling is called -(super)magic.
Meanwhile, Simanjuntak, Bertault, and Miller [Citation3] define an -edge-antimagic total labeling for a graph as a bijection from onto the set such that the edge-weights defined by , , constitute an arithmetic sequence for some positive integers and . Inspired by the two previous concepts, Inayah, Salman, and Simanjuntak [Citation4] introduced an --antimagic total labeling of a graph. Let be a graph that admits an -covering. An --antimagic total labeling of a graph is a bijection such that for all subgraphs isomorphic to , the -weights, form an arithmetic progression where are two fixed integers and is the number of subgraphs of isomorphic to . In this condition, is said to be --antimagic. Particularly, if , then is called a super --antimagic total labeling. In this condition, is said to be super --antimagic.
Many results about super --antimagic total labeling have been found. For instances, in [Citation5] Inayah et al. proved that shack is super --antimagic. Laurence and Kathiresan [Citation6] investigated super --antimagic total labeling of stars. Susilowati et al. [Citation7] studied super --antimagic total labeling for ladder graph. Meanwhile, cycle-super antimagicness of tensor product of graphs has been studied by Purnapraja et al. [Citation8].
In this paper we investigate the existence of super --antimagic total labeling of one kind of disconnected graphs, namely the disjoint union of copies of cycles denoted by .
2 An upper bound of for super --antimagic graphs
Lemma 1
Let and be graphs and let be the number of subgraphs of that is isomorphic to . If is super - -antimagic, then
Proof
Let , , and . Since is super --antimagic, the minimum -weight is at least . Hence, (1) (1) On the other hand, the maximum -weight is at most . Therefore, (2) (2) By combining (Equation(1)(1) (1) Equation(2)(2) (2) ), we obtain Since ,
3 Super --antimagic total labeling of
In this section we present super --antimagic total labeling of . Let be the disjoint union of copies of with and .
Observation 2
It follows from Lemma 1 that if is super - -antimagic, where and , then .
In the next theorem, we give a necessary condition for to be super --antimagic.
Theorem 3
For , if super - -antimagic, then
(i) | is odd and is odd, or |
(ii) | is even and is arbitrary |
Proof
Let be a super --antimagic total labeling of . The sum of -weights is . On the other hand, in the computation of -weights, the label of each vertex and edge of are counted once. Therefore, we obtain the following equation The value is an integer if and only if (i) is odd and is odd, or (ii) is even and is arbitrary. □
In the following theorem we prove the existence of super --antimagic total labeling of .
Theorem 4
has a super - -antimagic total labeling for and
Proof
Define a total labeling in the following way.
For
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
For
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
For
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
For
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
Clearly, . Next, let be the subgraphs of with and . Then, consider the following cases for the -weights as follows.
• | For It can be checked that for , |
• | For It can be checked that for , |
• | For It can be checked that for , |
• | For It can be checked that for , |
From all cases above, we can see that , , build an arithmetic sequence with first term and common difference . Therefore, for and , has a super --antimagic total labeling. □
Theorem 5
has a super - -antimagic total labeling for
Proof
Define a total labeling in the following way.
For and
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
For and is odd
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
For and is even
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
Clearly, . Next, let be the subgraphs of with and . Then, we get the -weights as follows.
• | For and It can be checked that for , |
• | For and is odd It can be checked that for , |
• | For and is even It can be checked that for , |
, , build an arithmetic sequence starting from with difference . Therefore, the graph , for , has a super --antimagic total labeling. □
Theorem 6
has a super - -antimagic total labeling for
Proof
Define a total labeling in the following way.
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
Clearly, . Next, let be the subgraphs of with and . Then, we get the -weights as follows. , , build an arithmetic progression . Therefore, the graph , for , has a super --antimagic total labeling. □
Open Problem 1
For arbitrary and , determine a super - -antimagic total labeling of for the remaining even
Open Problem 2
For odd and arbitrary , determine a super - -antimagic total labeling of for odd
Notes
Peer review under responsibility of Kalasalingam University.
References
- Gutiérrez A. Lladó A. Magic coverings J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 55 2005 43
- Kotzig A. Rosa A. Magic valuations of finite graphs Canad. Math. Bull. 13 4 1970 451 461
- R. Simanjuntak, F. Bertault, M. Miller, Two new (a,d)-antimagic graph labelings, in: Proc. of Eleventh Australasian Workshop on Combinatorial Algorithms, vol. 11, 2000, pp. 179–189.
- Inayah N. Salman A. Simanjuntak R. On (a,d)-H-antimagic coverings of graphs J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 71 2009 273
- Inayah N. Simanjuntak R. Salman A. Syuhada K. Super (a,d)-H-antimagic total labelings for shackles of a connected graph H Australas. J. Combin. 57 2013 127 138
- Laurence S.D. Kathiresan K. On super (a,d)-Ph-antimagic total labeling of Stars AKCE Int. J. Graphs Comb. 12 1 2015 54 58
- Susilowati L. Sania T. Estuningsih N. Super (a,d)-Cn-antimagic total labeling of ladder graph Adv. Appl. Discrete Math. 10 2012 77 93
- Purnapraja A. Hidayat R. Cycle-super antimagicness of connected and disconnected tensor product of graphs Procedia Comput. Sci. 74 2015 93 99