![MathJax Logo](/templates/jsp/_style2/_tandf/pb2/images/math-jax.gif)
Abstract
The distinguishing index of a graph , denoted by
, is the least number of labels in an edge coloring of
not preserved by any non-trivial automorphism. The distinguishing chromatic index
of a graph
is the least number
such that
has a proper edge coloring with
labels that is preserved only by the identity automorphism of
. In this paper we compute the distinguishing chromatic index for some specific graphs. Also we study the distinguishing chromatic index of corona product and join of two graphs.
1 Introduction
Let be a simple graph and
denote the automorphism group of
. For
, the neighborhood of
is the set
. The degree of
in a graph
, denoted by
, is the number of edges of
incident with
. In particular,
is the number of neighbors of
in
. Also, the maximum degree of
is denoted by
.
A proper edge coloring of a nonempty graph
(a graph with edges) is a function
, where
is a set of labels (colors), with the property that
for every two adjacent edges
and
of
. If the labels are chosen from a set of
labels, then
is called a proper
-edge coloring of
. The minimum positive integer
for which
has a proper
-edge coloring is called the chromatic index of
and is denoted by
. As a result of Vizing’s theorem, the chromatic index of every nonempty graph
is one of two numbers, namely
or
. A graph
with
is called a class one graph while a graph
with
is called a class two graph. For instance, it is proved that,
is a class one graph if
is even and is a class two graph if
is odd, and also every regular graph of odd order is a class two graph. The next two results are about graphs who are class one.
Theorem 1.1
Citation[1] Every bipartite graph is a class one graph.
Corollary 1.2
Citation[2] If is a graph in which no two vertices of maximum degree are adjacent, then
is a class one graph.
A proper vertex coloring of a graph is a function
, such that
for every pair
and
of adjacent vertices of
. If
, then
is called a proper
-vertex coloring of
. The minimum positive integer
for which G has a proper
-vertex coloring is called the chromatic number of
and is denoted by
.
A coloring of ,
, is said to be
-distinguishing, if no non-trivial automorphism of
preserves all of the vertex labels. The point of the labels on the vertices is to destroy the symmetries of the graph, that is, to make the automorphism group of the labeled graph trivial. Formally,
is
-distinguishing if for every non-trivial
, there exists
in
such that
. Authors often refer to a coloring as a coloring, but there is no assumption that adjacent vertices get different colors. Of course the goal is to minimize the number of colors used. Consequently the distinguishing number of a graph
is defined by
This number has been defined in Citation[3]. If a graph has no nontrivial automorphisms, its distinguishing number is . In other words,
for the asymmetric graphs. The other extreme,
, occurs if and only if
. Collins and Trenk Citation[4] defined the distinguishing chromatic number
of a graph
for proper colorings, so
is the least number
such that
has a proper coloring with
labels that is only preserved by the trivial automorphism. Similar to this definition, Kalinowski and Pilśniak Citation[5] have defined the distinguishing index
of
which is the least integer
such that
has an edge coloring with
colors that is preserved only by a trivial automorphism. The distinguishing index and number of some examples of graphs were exhibited in Citation[3,5]. For instance,
for every
, and
for
,
for
. It is easy to see that the value
can be large. For example
and
, for
. A symmetric tree, denoted by
, is a tree with a central vertex
, all leaves at the same distance
from
and all the vertices which are not leaves with degree
. A bisymmetric tree, denoted by
, is a tree with a central edge
, all leaves at the same distance
from
and all the vertices which are not leaves with degree
. The following theorem gives upper bounds for
based on the maximum degree of
.
Theorem 1.3
(i) | If | ||||
(ii) | Let |
Also, Kalinowski and Pilśniak Citation[5] defined the distinguishing chromatic index of a graph
as the least number
such that
has a proper edge coloring with
labels that is preserved only by the identity automorphism of
.
Theorem 1.4
Citation[5] If is a connected graph of order
, then
, except for four graphs of small order
,
,
,
.
This theorem immediately implies the following interesting result. A proper edge coloring of with
colors is called minimal.
Theorem 1.5
Citation[5] Every connected class 2 graph admits a minimal edge coloring that is not preserved by any nontrivial automorphism.
We need the following results.
Theorem 1.6
Citation[4] If is a tree of order
, then
. Moreover, equality is achieved if and only if
is either a symmetric or a path of odd length.
Theorem 1.7
Citation[5] If is a tree of order
, then
, if and only if
is a bisymmetric tree.
In the next section, we compute the distinguishing chromatic index of certain graphs such as friendship and book graphs. More precisely, we present a table of results that shows the chromatic index, the distinguishing index and the distinguishing chromatic index for various families of connected graphs. Also we obtain a relationship between the chromatic distinguishing number of line graph of graph
and the chromatic distinguishing index of
. In Section 3, we study the distinguishing chromatic index of join and corona product of two graphs.
2 The distinguishing chromatic index of certain graphs
Observation 2.1
(i) | For any graph | ||||
(ii) | If |
By this observation and Theorem 1.4 we can conclude that for any connected graph of order
and maximum degree
,
is
or
, except for
,
,
,
. In the latter case,
. Hence, for any connected graph
we have
, and equality is only achieved for
,
,
, and
. By Theorem 1.5, it can be seen that
, for class 2 graphs. In the following theorem we present a family of class 1 graphs such that
.
Theorem 2.2
Let be a class one graph, i.e.,
. If there exists a vertex
of
for which
for all automorphisms
of
, then
.
Proof
By contradiction suppose that . Then, for any proper
-coloring
of
, there exists a nonidentity automorphism
of
preserving the coloring
. By hypothesis, we have
. Since the incident edges to
have different labels, so
fixes every adjacent vertex to
, because
preserves the coloring
. By the same argument for every adjacent vertex to
, we can conclude that
is the identity automorphism, which is a contradiction.□
By Theorems 1.3, 1.4 and 1.7, we can characterize all connected graphs with .
Theorem 2.3
Let be a connected graph of order
and maximum degree
.
(i) | There is no connected graph | ||||
(ii) |
| ||||
(iii) |
|
Here, we want to obtain the distinguishing chromatic index of complete bipartite graphs. Before we obtain the distinguishing chromatic index of complete bipartite graphs we need the following information of Citation[7]: A coloring with labels of the edges of a complete bipartite graph
having parts
of size
and
of size
corresponds to a
matrix with entries from
. The
entry of the matrix is
whenever the edge between the
th vertex in
and the
th vertex in
has label
. We call this the bipartite adjacency matrix. For edge labeled complete bipartite graphs, the parts
and
map to themselves if
. In this case, if
is the bipartite adjacency matrix, then an automorphism corresponds to selecting permutation matrices
and
such that
. If
then we also have automorphisms of the form
. For any matrix with entries from
the degree of a column is a
-tuple
with
equal to the number of entries that are
in the column.
Theorem 2.4
Citation[7] Let be the adjacency matrix of a
-edge labeled complete bipartite graph.
(i) | If there are two identical rows in | ||||
(ii) | If |
Theorem 2.5
The distinguishing chromatic index of complete bipartite graph where
, is
.
Proof
Let be the following
adjacency matrix of a
-edge labeled complete bipartite graph,
Then it is clear that
is a proper edge coloring. By Theorem 2.4(ii), it can be concluded that
is a distinguishing coloring. In fact, the rows of
are distinct, and since the number of label
in the
th column is one and in the
th column,
, is zero, so the columns have distinct degrees. Hence
.□
Before we prove the next result, we need the following preliminaries: By the result obtained by Fisher and Isaak Citation[7] and independently by Imrich, Jerebic and Klavžar Citation[8] the distinguishing index of complete bipartite graphs is as follows.
Theorem 2.6
Citation[7,8] Let be integers such that
and
. Then
If
then the distinguishing index
is either
or
and can be computed recursively in
time.
The friendship graph
can be constructed by joining
copies of the cycle graph
with a common vertex.
Theorem 2.7
Citation[9] Let . For every
,
The -book graph
is defined as the Cartesian product
. We call every
in the book graph
, a page of
. The distinguishing index of Cartesian product of star
with path
for
and
is
, unless
and
for some integer
. In the latter case
, [10]. Since
, using this equality we obtain the distinguishing index of book graph
.
Theorem 2.8
The entries in are correct.
Table 1. Table of results for χ, D′ and χ′D
Proof
The chromatic index and the distinguishing index for the classes of graphs given in this table are well-known, we justify the entries in the last column.
Paths of even order. The coloring that uses label 2 for one end-edge and label for the remaining edges is distinguishing, however, it is not a proper coloring and any proper coloring using two labels is not distinguishing, so
. A
-coloring that is proper and distinguishing is achieved by using
for an end-edge and alternating 2’s and 3’s for the remaining edges, thus
. Thus the result follows.
Cycles of even order , where
. Let the consecutive edges of
be
. Using label 3 for edges
and
, label 2 for edges
where
is odd and label 1 for edges
where
is even, we get
for
. All proper 2-colorings of edges of
have label preserving automorphisms, thus
for all
. Therefore
, where
.
Friendship and book graphs. It is clear that each proper -coloring of edges of
is distinguishing and so
, by Theorem 2.2. For the book graph
, we present a proper
-distinguishing edge coloring. Let
and
be two vertices of degree
of
, and
be the adjacent vertices to
, and
be the adjacent vertices to
, such that
for
are pages of
. We label the edges
,
and
with labels
,
and
mod
, respectively, for any
,
. Also, we label the edge
with label
. It can be seen that our coloring is a proper
-distinguishing coloring.
Complete graphs of even order. It is known that we can partition the edge set of to
sets, each set contains an
-element perfect matching, say
. If we label the edges of
-element perfect matching
with label
, for any
, then it can be seen that this coloring is proper. We claim that this coloring is distinguishing. If
is an automorphism of
preserving the coloring, then
fixes the set
, for any
, setwise. If
is a nonidentity automorphism, then without loss of generality we can assume that
. Since
preserves the coloring so
. We can suppose that there exists a vertex
of
such that the edges
and
are not in the same perfect matching. Thus the labels of edges
and
are different, while
maps these two edges to each other, which is a contradiction. Then, the identity automorphism is the only automorphism of
preserving the coloring, and hence the proper edge coloring is distinguishing, and so
.
Complete bipartite graph ,
. We can partition the edge set of
to
perfect matching
, each of
contains
edges. For every value of
, the coloring that uses label
for all edges in
,
, is a proper coloring. Also, every proper coloring of
partitions the edges of
to
sets
such that each of
is a perfect matching of
and all edges in
have the same label, and different from the label of edges in
for every
where
. However, for every proper coloring of
we can find a nonidentity automorphism of
preserving the coloring, thus
. Now the result follows from Theorem 1.4.□
In sequel, we want to obtain a relationship between the chromatic distinguishing number of line graph of graph
and the chromatic distinguishing index of
. For this purpose, we need more information about automorphism group of
. For a simple graph
, we recall that the line graph
is a graph whose vertices are edges of
and where two edges
are adjacent if they share an endpoint in common. Let
be given by
for every
. In [11], Sabidussi proved the following theorem which we will use throughout.
Theorem 2.9
[11] Suppose that is a connected graph that is not
, or
(see ). Then
is a group isomorphism, and so
.
Theorem 2.10
Suppose that is a connected graph of order
that is not
and
. Then
.
Proof
First, we show that . For this purpose, let
be an edge proper distinguishing coloring of
. We define
such that
where
. By the following steps we show that the vertex coloring
is proper distinguishing coloring.
Step (1) | The vertex coloring | ||||
Step (2) | The vertex coloring |
By a similar argument we can prove that , and so the result follows.□
Now we state a difference between the distinguishing coloring and chromatic distinguishing coloring of graphs.
Remark 2.11
Despite the distinguishing coloring that for all connected graph
, it may be happened that
. For instance, let
be the graph obtained from
by replacing each edge with a path of length three. It can be computed that
, while
, see .
We end this section by proposing the following problem.
Problem 2.12
Characterize all connected graphs with .
3 Results for join and corona products
In this section we study the distinguishing chromatic index of join and corona product of graphs. We start with join of graphs. The graph is the join of two graphs
and
, if
and
and denoted by
.
Theorem 3.1
If and
are two connected graphs of orders
, respectively, then
Proof
To prove the left inequality, it is sufficient to know that and
. For the right inequality, we first set
. We label the edge set of graph
(resp.
) with labels
(resp.
) in a proper distinguishing way. If
and
, then we label the middle edges
, exactly the same as a proper distinguishing coloring of the complete bipartite graph
with labels
. Since the graphs
and
have a proper coloring, so this coloring of edges of
is proper, regarding to the label of middle edges. To show this coloring is distinguishing, we suppose that
is an automorphism of
preserving the coloring. Then, with respect to the label of middle edges, it can be concluded that the restriction of
to the vertices of
(resp.
) is an automorphism of
(resp.
) preserving the coloring. Since the graphs
and
have been labeled distinguishingly, so the restriction of
to vertices of
and
is the identity automorphism of
and
, respectively. Therefore, this coloring is distinguishing. □
The lower and upper bounds of Theorem 3.1 are sharp. For example, we consider where
, with
. In fact, we can label the edge set of
and
with labels 1 and 2 in a proper distinguishing way, and label the remaining incident edges to each vertex of
with distinct labels
such that the incident edges to each vertex of
in
have distinct labels.
Now we want to obtain a lower and anupper bound for the distinguishing chromatic index of corona product. The corona product of two graphs
and
is defined as the graph obtained by taking one copy of
and
copies of
and joining the
th vertex of
to every vertex in the
th copy of
. If
and
be two connected graphs such that
, then there is no vertex in the copies of
which has the same degree as a vertex in
. Because if there exist a vertex
in one of the copies of
and a vertex
in
such that
, then
. So we have
, which is a contradiction. Hence, we can state the following lemma.
Lemma 3.2
Let and
be two connected graphs such that
. If
is an arbitrary automorphism of
, then the restriction of
to the vertices of copy
(resp.
) is an automorphism of
(resp.
).
Theorem 3.3
If and
are two connected graphs of orders
, respectively, then
Proof
The proof of the left inequality is exactly the same as Theorem 3.1. To prove the right inequality, we first set . We label the edge set of graph
(resp.
) with labels
(resp.
) in a proper distinguishing way. If
and
, then we label the middle edge
with label
for any
and
. Since the graphs
and
have been labeled properly, so this coloring of edges of
is proper, due to the label of middle edges. To show this coloring is distinguishing, we suppose that
is an automorphism of
preserving the coloring. Then, by Lemma 3.2, it can be concluded that the restriction of
to the vertices of
(resp.
) is an automorphism of
(resp.
) preserving the coloring. Since the graphs
and
have been labeled distinguishingly, so the restriction of
to vertices of
and
is the identity automorphism of
and
respectively. Therefore, this coloring is distinguishing. □
The lower and upper bounds of Theorem 3.3 are sharp. For instance, we consider where
. It can be easily computed that
. Now, since
and
, so the bounds of Theorem 3.3 are sharp.
We end this paper by a remark on the distinguishing chromatic index of join and corona product of graphs and
where
or
.
Remark 3.4
(i) | If | ||||
(ii) | It is clear that |
References
- KönigD., Über graphen und ihre anwendung auf determinantentheorie und mengenlehre, Math. Ann., 77 1916 453–465
- FournierJ.C., Colorations des arétes d’un graphe, Cah. CERO (Bruxelles), 15 1973 311–314
- AlbertsonM.O., CollinsK.L., Symmetry breaking in graphs, Electron. J. Combin., 3 1996 #R18
- CollinsK.L., TrenkA.N., The distinguishing chromatic number, Electron. J. Combin., 1312006 #R16
- KalinowskiR., PilśniakM., Distinguishing graphs by edge colourings, European J. Combin., 45 2015 124–131
- PilśniakM., Improving upper bounds for the distinguishing index, Ars Math. Contemp., 13 2017 259–274
- FisherM.J., IsaakG., Distinguishing colorings of Cartesian products of complete graphs, Discrete Math., 308112008 2240–2246
- ImrichW., JerebicJ., KlavžarS., The distinguishing number of Cartesian products of complete graphs, European J. Combin., 29 2008 922–929
- AlikhaniS., SoltaniS., Distinguishing number and distinguishing index of certain graphs, Filomat, 31142017 4393–4404
- GorzkowskaA., KalinowskiR., PilsniakM., The distinguishing index of the Cartesian product of finite graphs, Ars Math. Contemp., 1212016 77–87
- SabidussiG., Graph derivatives, Math. Z., 76 1961 385–401