![MathJax Logo](/templates/jsp/_style2/_tandf/pb2/images/math-jax.gif)
Abstract
A simple graph admits an
-covering if every edge in
belongs to a subgraph of
isomorphic to
. The graph
is said to be
-magic if there exists a total labeling
such that for every subgraph
of
isomorphic to
,
is constant. Additionally, the labeling
is called
-
supermagic labeling if
. In this paper, we study
-
-supermagic labeling of some families of connected graphs.
1 Introduction
We consider finite and simple graphs. The vertex and edge sets of a graph are denoted by
and
, respectively. Let
be a graph. An edge- covering of
is a family of subgraphs
such that each edge of
belongs to at least one of the subgraphs
,
. Then it is said that
admits an
-(edge) covering. If every
is isomorphic to a given graph
, then
admits an
-covering. Suppose
admits an
-covering. A total labeling
is called an
-magic labeling of
if there exists a positive integer
(called the magic constant) such that for every subgraph
of
isomorphic to
,
. A graph that admits such a labeling is called
-magic. An
-magic labeling
is called an
-
-supermagic labeling if
. A graph that admits an
-
-supermagic labeling is called an
-
-supermagic graph. The sum of all vertex and edge labels on
(under a labeling
) is denoted by
.
The notion of -magic labeling was introduced by Gutierrez and Lladó Citation[1] in 2005. They proved that the star graph
and the complete bipartite graphs
are
-supermagic for some
. They also proved that the paths
and the cycles
are
-supermagic for some
.
In 2007, Llado and Moragas Citation[2] studied some -supermagic graphs. They proved that the wheel
, the windmill
, the subdivided wheel
and the graph obtained by joining two end vertices of any number of internally disjoint paths of length
are
-supermagic for some
. Maryati et al. Citation[3] studied some
-supermagic trees. They proved that shrubs, balanced subdivision of shrubs and banana trees are
-supermagic for some
.
MacDougall et al. Citation[4] and Swaminathan and Jeyanthi Citation[5] introduced different labelings with the same name super vertex-magic total labeling. To avoid confusion Marimuthu and Balakrishnan Citation[6] call a vertex magic total labeling is -super if
. Note that the smallest labels are assigned to the edges. A graph
is called
-super vertex magic if it admits
-super vertex labeling. There are many graphs that have been proved to be
-super vertex magic; see for instance Citation[7,8] and Citation[9]. For further information about
-
-supermagic graphs, see [Citation10].
In this paper, we study -
-supermagic labeling of some families of connected graphs such as generalized books, generalization of a graph obtained by joining of a star
with one isolated vertex found in [Citation11], generalized fans, generalized friendship graphs and generalized grids.
2 ![](//:0)
-![](//:0)
-Supermagic graphs
A bookgraph , is defined as follows:
We define the generalized bookgraph
with vertex and edge sets by
The following theorem shows that the generalized bookgraph
is
-
-supermagic.
Theorem 2.1
For any integer and
and
the generalized book graph
is
-
-supermagic.
Proof
We define a total labeling as given below.
The case of odd n:
The case of even n:
Let us show that
is a
-
-supermagic labeling.
For this, let ,
be the subcycle of the graph
with
For each
,
, we have
This completes the proof. □
Consider the graph , where
and
.
We define the generalization of the graph
given above as follows:
Now we prove that the graph
is
-
-supermagic.
Theorem 2.2
For any positive integer and
,
the graph
is
-
-supermagic.
Proof
Define a total labeling as follows:
The case of odd
:
The case of even
:
To show that
is a
-
-supermagic labeling of
, Let
, for
be the subcycle of
with
For each
,
, we have
So
is a
-
-supermagic graph. □
To generalize the ladder , we can always substitute
with any path
. The resulting graph is the grid
with
vertices and
edges.
Now we define grid graph as
and
. Now we prove that the graph
is
-
-supermagic.
Theorem 2.3
For any positive integer and
the grid
is
-
-supermagic.
Proof
We define a total labeling .
Label the edges of in the following way:
For even
and
,
For odd
and
,
To label the vertices of
, we consider two cases depending on the values of
.
The case of :
For ,
For
,
Let ,
and
be the subcycle of
with
It can be checked that for each and
,
The case of :
Let ,
and
be the subcycle of
with
It can be checked that for each
and
,
Hence is
-
-supermagic. □
Open Problem 2.4
Determine -
-supermagic labeling of
for the remaining cases of
and
.
Let us define the friendship graph as follows:
The friendship graph is a set of
triangles having a common center vertex and otherwise disjoint.
Let denote the center vertex. For the
th triangle, let
and
denote the other two vertices.
We define the generalized friendship graph with vertex and edge sets by
The following result is interesting because it characterizes -
-supermagicness of generalized friendship graph
.
Theorem 2.5
For any integer , the generalized friendship graph
is
-
-supermagic.
Proof
Suppose that a bijection is
-
-supermagic total labeling.
We label the vertices of in the following way:
The case of odd ,
For and
,
The edge labeling for
, is given by,
For odd , and for
.
For even
, and for
The edge labeling for
, is given by,
The edge labeling for
, is given by,
The case of even
,
We label the vertices of in the following way:
The edge labeling for
is given by,
For odd and for
,
For even and for
The edge labeling for , is given by,
The edge labeling for
, is given by,
For each
, we have
This completes the proof. □
The generalized fan graph denoted by is a graph with
. Note that the vertices
are introduced between the vertices
and
.
Our next result shows that the generalized fan is
-
-supermagic for
and
,
(see ).
Theorem 2.6
For any integer ,
, the generalized fan
is
-
-supermagic.
Proof
Define a total labeling as follows:
We label the vertices of in the following way:
For the cases
, we introduce additional vertices
between
and
.
The vertex labeling of and edge labeling are defined as follows:
For
, let
be the subcycle of
with
It can be checked that for
,
, and
,
Hence
is a
-
-supermagic. □
Open Problem 2.7
Determine -
-supermagic labeling of generalized fan graphs
for the remaining cases of
and
.
References
- GutierrezA.LladóA., Magic coverings J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 552005 43–56
- LladóA.MoragasJ., Cycle- magic graphs Discrete Math. 307 23 2007 2925–2933
- MaryatiT.K.BaskoroE.T.SalmanA.N.M., Ph-Supermagic labeling of some trees J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 652008 197–204
- MacDougallJ.A.MillerM.SugengK.A., Super vertex magic labelings of graphs Proc. of the 15th Australian Workshop on Combinatorial Algorithms2004 222–229
- SwaminathanV.JeyanthiP., Super vertex magic labeling Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 34 6 2003 935–939
- MarimuthuG.BalakrishnanM., E-super vertex magic labelings of graphs Discrete Appl. Math. 1602012 1766–1774
- MarimuthuG.KumarG., On V-super and E-super vertex-magic total labelings of graphs Electron. Notes Discrete Math. 482015 223–230
- KumarG.MarimuthuG., On the degrees of E-super vertex-magic graphs Electron. Notes Discrete Math. 482015 217–222
- MarimuthuG.KumarG., Solution to some open problem on e-super vertex- magic labelings of disconnected graphs Appl. Math. Comput. 2682015 657–663
- StalinKumarS.MarimuthuG., H-E-super Magic decomposition of complete bipartite graphs Electron. Notes Discrete Math. 482015 297–300
- KathiresanKM.MarimuthuG.ChithraC., Cm-Supermagic labeling of graphs Electron. Notes Discrete Math. 482015 189–196