![MathJax Logo](/templates/jsp/_style2/_tandf/pb2/images/math-jax.gif)
Abstract
Let be a graph and let
be a positive integer. Let
=
and
. The
-token graph
is the graph with vertex set
and two vertices
and
are adjacent if
and
, where
denotes the symmetric difference. In this paper we present several basic results on 2-token graphs.
1 Introduction
By a graph we mean a finite undirected graph with neither loops nor multiple edges. The order
and the size
are denoted by
and
respectively. For graph theoretic terminology we refer to Chartrand and Zhang Citation[1].
For any set we denote by
the set of all
-element subsets of
. Monray et al. Citation[2] introduced the notion of
-token graph of a graph
.
Definition 1.1
Citation[2] Let be a graph and let
be an integer. The
-token graph
of
is the graph with vertex set
and two vertices
and
are adjacent if
where
.
Clearly and
.
We need the following theorems.
Theorem 1.2
Citation[2] If is bipartite for some
, then
is bipartite for all
.
Theorem 1.3
Citation[3] Let be a graph of order
and let
. Then
In this paper we investigate the 2-token graph . We repeatedly use the following observation.
Observation 1.4
Two vertices and
of
are adjacent if and only if
and
with
.
2 Main results
We first prove that for complete graphs the 2-token graph is its line graph.
Theorem 2.1
Let be a graph of order
. Then
is isomorphic to the line graph
if and only if
.
Proof
Suppose . Let
. Since
, it follows that
is adjacent to
and
for all
. Thus
. Hence
is isomorphic to
. Conversely, suppose that
. Then
and hence it follows that
.
Lemma 2.2
If a graph contains two vertex disjoint paths
and
, then
contains a cycle of length
.
Proof
Let and
where
. Then
,
is a cycle of length
in
.
Observation 2.3
If and
are two nonadjacent edges in
, then the corresponding cycle
given in Lemma 2.2 is an induced cycle.
Lemma 2.4
Let be a graph. Then
is triangle free if and only if
is triangle free.
Proof
Suppose is triangle free. If
contains a triangle say
,
, then
is a triangle in
which is a contradiction. The proof of the converse is similar.
In the following theorems we obtain a characterization of graph for which
is a tree or chordal graph.
Theorem 2.5
Let be a graph of order
. Then
is a tree if and only if
or
.
Proof
If , then
. If
, then
. Conversely, suppose
is a tree. If there exist two nonadjacent edges
and
in
, then
is a cycle in
, which is a contradiction. Hence any two edges in
are adjacent. Thus
or
. If
, then
. Now suppose
where
. Let
be the centre and let
be the pendent vertices of
. Then
is the cycle
in
, which is a contradiction. Hence
where
. Thus
or
.
Theorem 2.6
Let be a connected graph of order
and let
. Then
is a chordal graph if and only if
is isomorphic to one of the graphs
or
.
Proof
Suppose is a chordal graph. It follows from Observation 2.3 that any two edges of
are adjacent. Now proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 2.5 we get
or
. The converse is obvious.
In the following theorem we obtain a lower bound for the independence number of .
Theorem 2.7
Let be a connected graph of order
with
. Then
and the bound is sharp.
Proof
Let be a
-set of
. Let
and let
be a collection of disjoint 2-element subsets of
. Clearly
. Let
. Let
. Since
, it follows that
is not adjacent to
in
. Obviously no element
of
is adjacent with any element of
. Hence
is an independent set of
. Thus
. We observe that if
, then
and
, which shows that the above bound is sharp.
Theorem 2.8
Let be a graph of order
. If there exists a vertex
such that
, then
is isomorphic to a subgraph of
.
Proof
Let . Let
. Clearly the subgraph of
induced by
is isomorphic
. Now
is adjacent to
and
in
. Hence the subgraph of
induced by the set
is isomorphic to
.
Observation 2.9
The graph does not contain an induced subgraph isomorphic to
. This shows that Theorem 2.8 is not true if
has no vertex of degree 2.
Theorem 2.10
A connected graph is isomorphic to
if and only if the following conditions are satisfied.
(i) |
| ||||
(ii) | Every vertex of | ||||
(iii) | Every vertex of | ||||
(iv) | Any two vertices of |
Proof
Let where
. Let
be the centre of the star. Let
be the set of pendent vertices of
.
(i) Let and let
where
is the set of all 2-element subsets of
. Clearly
and
. Since
if
, it follows that
is not adjacent to
in
. Hence
is independent.
Now, let and
since
, it follows that
. Hence
is not adjacent to
in
. Hence
is independent. This proves (i).
(ii) Let . The vertices adjacent to
in
are given by
for any
. Hence every vertex of
has degree
.
(iii) Let . Hence
. The vertices adjacent to
are
and
. Hence any vertex of
has degree 2.
(iv) Let . Clearly
is the unique common neighbour.
Conversely, suppose satisfies the conditions (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv). Suppose
for some
. Since
, it follows that
. Now, let
. Hence the number of edges in
is
. But
. Hence it follows that
, so that
is a tree.
Suppose has 2 nonadjacent edges say
and
. Then
,
is a cycle in
. Hence
and
have
and
as common neighbours which contradicts (iv).
Hence it follows that is star
.
Theorem 2.11
Let be a connected graph of order
. Then
is bipartite if and only if
is bipartite.
Proof
Suppose is bipartite. Let
be the bipartition of
. If
, then
and hence it follows from Theorem 2.10 that
is bipartite.
Suppose and
. Let
and
. We claim that
is a bipartition of
. Since
and
are independent sets in
, it follows from Theorem 2.7 that
and
are independent sets in
. Further any element of
is not adjacent to any element of
. Hence
is independent.
Theorem 2.12
The cycle is
for some graph
if and only if
or 6.
Proof
Obviously and
. Conversely, suppose
for some graph
. Let
. Now since
is
free, it follows from Lemma 2.2 that any two edges in
are adjacent. Hence
or
. If
, then
where
is the centre of
which is a contradiction. Hence
. Thus
or
. Hence
or
.
3 Conclusion and scope
We observe that if for some graph
of order
then
. The following fundamental problem arises naturally.
Problem 3.1
If is a graph of order
, obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a graph
of order
such that
.
Theorem 2.7 gives a bound for and leads to the following problem.
Problem 3.2
Characterize graphs for which
.
References
- ChartrandG.ZhangP., Introduction To Graph Theory2006Tata McGraw Hill
- MonrayR.F.PenalozaD.F.HuemerG.HurtadsF.UrratiaJ.WoodD.R., Token graphs Graphs Combin. 282012 365–380
- DeepalakshmiJ.MarimuthuG., Characterization of token graphs J. Eng. Math. 62017 310–317