Highlights
• | We offer a framework for participatory research in sport-for-development (SfD). | ||||
• | The structures of authority that influence participatory research are addressed. | ||||
• | We bring together more than a decade of primary research across different countries. | ||||
• | We discuss specific and practical examples of participatory research in SfD. | ||||
• | We provide suggestions for future research, policy and practice in the field of SfD. |
Abstract
In this paper, the authors examine how participatory research can be conceptualized and fostered in sport-for-development (SfD). The authors offer a conceptualization of participatory research that centers on the interplay between three dimensions: participation, power, and reflexivity. Drawing on variegated experiences with SfD research across different geographical locations, the authors scrutinize the conceptual and empirical linkages between these dimensions, and how these linkages are influenced by structures of authority. Findings suggest that most SfD research falls short with regard to the critical challenge of embracing and delivering high degrees of participation, power shifting, and reflexivity. More specifically, SfD researchers typically fail to relinquish power and control over the research process. The SfD research community would likely benefit from greater inclusivity and collaboration when designing creative ways to improve this state of affairs. The authors conclude by reflecting on the implications and by suggesting ways to promote participatory and activist research in SfD contexts.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the editor-in-chief and the anonymous reviewers for their excellent and generous feedback on earlier versions of this paper.
Notes
1 See the Sport and Development platform (http://www.sportanddev.org) of the Swiss Academy for Development for a detailed overview of SfD initiatives from around the world.